High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/26860/2019disposed of

Savitri Devi v. The State Of Haryana And Others

2019-10-30Mr. Justice Amit Rawal2 pages

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.11.02 14:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-26860-2019 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26860-2019 (O&M) Date of decision : 30.10.2019 Savitri Devi ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Jagbir Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) Additional affidavit of the petitioner, filed in Court today, is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Petitioner is seeking indulgence of this Court for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant the benefit of compassionate appointment to the son of petitioner as per Haryana Compassionate Assistant to the dependents of deceased Government Employees Rules 2006 (Annexure P-5) on account of death of the only bread earner of the petitioner as has been granted to other similar situated deceased employees and in this regard, had submitted advance notice dated 09.04.2019 (Annexure P-9), but there is no adherence thereto. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that he will be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.2-Indian Red Cross Society, District Branch Fatehabad through its President, Deputy Commissioner,

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.11.02 14:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-26860-2019 (O&M) Fatehabad, to consider the advance notice dated 09.04.2019 (Annexure P-9), within a stipulated period.

Without going into the merits and demerits of the claim of the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2, to consider the advance notice dated 09.04.2019 (Annexure P-9), within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and shall pass a speaking order thereon after affording opportunity of hearing to petitioner, failing which, respondent No.2, shall be liable to pay costs of `25,000/- to petitioner.

This condition of imposing costs is only to prevent petitioner to run from pillar to post and avail remedy of contempt in case of noncompliance of directions issued by this Court. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE 30.10.2019 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No