Deepa Lamba v. Kamal Arora

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.104 Date of Decision: 13.12.2024
 
 ....Applicant

Versus



 .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Ankit Chowdhri, Advocate for the applicant.

Respondent proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 04.12.2024.

***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
 

 

   

          

!" 
 

 #$  

# "    "&#     & '  & 

(  )& * +      "  

  &    "     ,     

     -$    "      #&

  #$   counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on

28.08.2018. One daughter was born from the said wedlock, who is about 4 years old and is in the care and custody of the applicant. On account of the matrimonial discord, the parties are residing separate. The applicant has filed the petition for seeking divorce, the petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, as well as the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C., copies whereof are Annexures P-2, P-3 and P-4, respectively. Also, it is submitted that in all the three said cases, the respondent is making appearance in the Courts at Yamuna Nagar. The daughter born from the wedlock of the parties, is student of L.K.G. in the school at Yamuna Nagar. Furthermore, it is submitted that the applicant is not working and as such, has no source of earning.

In the given circumstances, it is submitted that it is difficult for the applicant to defend the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, from a distance of about 60 kilometres, more particularly, while taking care of the minor daughter.

!"  
  

 #$  

# "    &

"&#" '  & 

(  )&  * 
.    #

#$ %&$ ' "&#" /    0")& *

,   /         0"  )&   *"       ")& *1- "     # ")& *"

  &

& $

 (ARCHANA PURI) 13.12.2024 JUDGE Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

Yes/No