← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/19924/2023disposed of

Shree Ganesh Rice Mill Through Its Authorized Partner v. State Of Haryana And Others

2023-09-11Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal2 pages

CWP-19924 of 2023 2023:PHHC:118264

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19924 of 2023 Date of decision : September 11, 2023 Shree Ganesh Rice Mills ...... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL *** Present :-Mr. Manu Loona, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G. Haryana.

*** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to allot paddy as per milling policy for the year 2023-2024.

2.

The petitioner is engaged in the business of milling rice. The petitioner is dependent upon paddy supplied by the State Government Agencies. The State Government every year frames milling policy known as Kharif Marketing Season Policy (KMS). Like other years the respondent has framed KMS Policy for 2023-2024. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent is not allotting paddy to the petitioner as per his entitlement. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the earlier occasion for the same relief, the petitioner preferred CWP-13260-2020 before this Court which came to be disposed of vide order dated 01.09.2020. This ARCHANA ARORA 2023.09.11 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment

CWP-19924 of 2023 2023:PHHC:118264 Court directed the petitioner to appear before the respondent. The respondent was directed to decide representation of the petitioner by way of speaking order. The petitioner has filed representation dated 25.08.2023 (Annexure P13) before the respondents who are not paying heed to the aforesaid representation.

4.

Notice of motion.

5.

Mr. Raman Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Haryana who on advance notice is present in Court accepts notice. He submits that respondent No.2 would look into the representation of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order within two weeks from today. 6.

In the wake of statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, present petition stands disposed of. ( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) JUDGE September 11, 2023 archana Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No ARCHANA ARORA 2023.09.11 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment