Annu And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRWP-8378-2024 Date of Decision: August 30, 2024 ANNU AND ANR ......Petitioner(s) V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ......Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL

Present:

Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. B.S. Virk, Senior DAG, Haryana.

**** SANDEEP MOUDGIL , J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks protection of life and liberty of the petitioners by contending that both of them having attained the age of majority and have married each other against the wishes of their respective family members i.e., respondent Nos.4 to 6 and to seek appropriate protection from the authorities. They submitted a representation dated 27.08.2024 (Annexure P-5) in this regard to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana, but are still apprehensive about their security in view of the apparent inaction and alleged clout of their family members-respondents.

Notice of motion.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. B.S. Virk, Senior DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. A copy of the paper-book be handed over to him during the course of the day. SANGEETA 2024.08.30 19:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-8378-2024 Both of them do appear to have crossed the age of majority as seen from the copies of documents filed and have married each other, in support of which, Marriage Certificate (Annexure P-4) and marriage photographs (Annexure P-3), have been placed on record. For the aforesaid reasons, this appears to be a fit case for this Court to invoke the inherent powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. and in view of the mandate contained in Article 21 of the Constitution of India to protect the citizen's right to life and liberty. Thus, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana, is directed to consider the representation dated 27.08.2024 (Annexure P-5) and take appropriate steps to ensure that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners.

It is nevertheless clarified that this order is issued only on the premise that the petitioners have crossed the age of majority as seen from the documents placed on record being their Aadhar Cards as Annexures P-1 and P-2. This would not ipso facto amount to granting any seal of approval on the legality of their marriage which essentially would come in the domain of the concerned Matrimonial Courts. Further, they would not be entitled for any protection against their arrest or continuance of any criminal proceedings, if otherwise, found to be involved in commission of any cognizable offence(s).

The petition is disposed of with the above direction. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 30.08.2024 Sangeeta Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No SANGEETA 2024.08.30 19:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document