State Of Haryana And ORS v. M/S K.L.J Developers Pvt Ltd Etc

RFA No. 3252 of 2015 (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RFA No. 3252 of 2015 (O&M) Date of decision :18.9.2015 The State of Haryana and another ... Appellants vs M/s KLJ Developers Private Limited and another .. Respondents Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

Present:

Mr. Arun Beniwal, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal, J.

This order will dispose of a bunch of appeals bearing RFA Nos. 3252 to 3258 of 2015, as common questions of law and facts are involved therein.

The State is in appeal seeking reduction of compensation for the acquired land.

Briefly, the facts of the case are that State of Haryana vide notification dated 7.2.2008, issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') sought to acquire land measuring 10.81 acres situated in village Neemka, Tehsil and District Faridabad for development and utilization thereof as residential and commercial for Sectors 76, 77 and 78, Faridabad. The same was followed by notification dated 6.2.2009, issued under Section 6 of the Act. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, 'the Collector'), vide award dated 22.5.2012, assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ` 42,00,000/- per acre. Aggrieved against the award of the Collector, the land owners filed objections which were referred to the learned court below, who keeping in view the material placed on record by the parties, assessed the compensation for the acquired land @ ` 1052/- per square yard. The same has been impugned by the State before SHARMILA 2015.09.24 15:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.

Chandigarh

RFA No. 3252 of 2015 (2) this Court.

Learned counsel for the State very fairly submitted that in view of the judgement of this Court in RFA No. 7108 of 2012- Rampal and others v. Land Acquisition Collector and another, decided on 16.9.2015, nothing survives in the present set of appeals.

Accordingly, for the reasons recorded in Rampal's (supra), the present appeals are dismissed. Consequently, the accompanying applications are also dismissed.

18.9.2015 (Rajesh Bindal) sharmila Judge SHARMILA 2015.09.24 15:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.

Chandigarh