Satish Chand & ORS v. State Of Haryana & ORS

VINOD KUMAR 2015.01.17 12:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh RFA No.2786 of 2014 (O&M) [ 1 ] *****

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH RFA No.2786 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision:13.01.2015 Satish Chand and others ...Appellants

Versus

State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain

Present:

Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Deepak Baliyan, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

***** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral) CM No.4424-CI-2014 There is a delay of 433 days in filing of the appeal. Notice in the application was issued to which no reply has been filed. For the reasons mentioned in the application, supported by an affidavit, the delay of 433 days in filing of the appeal is hereby condoned. C.M. stands disposed of.

RFA No.2786 of 2014 Admitted.

This appeal has been taken up with the concurrence of the counsel for the parties who have submitted that this case may be disposed of at this stage as the same is covered by the judgment of this Court rendered

VINOD KUMAR 2015.01.17 12:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh RFA No.2786 of 2014 (O&M) [ 2 ] ***** in RFA No.2075 of 2012 titled as "Sohan Lal and another v. The State of Haryana and others" decided on 03.09.2014.

Since the matter pertaining to the same acquisition has already been decided by this Court and the amount of compensation has been enhanced to `1,230/- per square yard, therefore, this appeal is also being disposed of in terms of the order dated 03.09.2014 passed by this Court in RFA No.2075 of 2012 titled as "Sohan Lal and another v. The State of Haryana and others".

January 13, 2015 ( Rakesh Kumar Jain ) vinod* Judge