Sachin v. State Of Haryana

  



  

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-51578-2021
(O&M) Date of decision: 11.03.2022 Sachin

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent






  
 


 

  

            

  ****   
 






 


 

     

 

    

    

   

!"# $ %&&  '& '( )'&* 

    %') %'% %'+ %)% %), &-+ &-( &-* &'* &)'. "
/ 
    0 $ 

  



2        3        

4

3



 !"#

             

     4           64  

7    #  8  95   

   3    5       

 

  &: '( )'&*5     

        4  

  //6

 

   3     . 3  #     ;  < =  



           3

 

     

   

MANGAL SINGH 2022.03.11 18:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

  



 


   3            ,      

  

     >  2   4  3

 

    

 3    

  

  7

3       

    

4       

      

  3     

   3 "

         The petitioner has been in custody since 16.08.2019. Though the petitioner was named in the FIR, yet no specific role has been attributed to him. Only kicks and fist blows have been attributed to the petitioner, upon Talwinder and Harjeet but not upon Ravinder (since deceased). Three similarly placed co-accused are on regular bail. The charges are yet to be framed, therefore, the conclusion of the trial would take a long time. Hence, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars. "  4      33 

  

  3  

  7            

 4     

        

     



 

           /?1





  
 


 





   @ ?



B?$ @  A

B?$ MANGAL SINGH 2022.03.11 18:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document