Veena Rani v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP NO. 24944 OF 2021 DATE OF DECISION: 16.12.2021 Veena Rani

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Present :

Mr. Sunil K. Nehra, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. AG, Haryana.

(Presence marked through video conferencing). ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) Petitioner herein, inter alia, seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamusdirecting the respondents to promote the petitioner as Stenographer from the date she cleared her shorthand test, as her juniors were immediately promoted, whereas the petitioner was promoted after 11 months of her passing the test.

2.

On advance service of copy of the petition, learned State counsel joins the proceedings.

3.

Perusal of the impugned order dated 31.08.2020 (Annexure P-15) reveals that same is non-speaking and does not reveal any reasons that transpired in the mind of the competent authority to reject the claim of the petitioner.

SHALINI BHATIA 2021.12.18 04:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

4.

Confronted with the situation, learned State counsel submits that fresh orders will be passed giving proper reasons thereof. 5.

Needful be done within a period of two months from today. 6.

Disposed of accordingly.

DECEMBER 16, 2021 (ARUN MONGA) Shalini JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No SHALINI BHATIA 2021.12.18 04:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document