Kishor Kumar v. State Of Haryana And ORS




    
  





CWP-22303-2024



 
 


 

 

  !


"

# 

$ 

% &        
   

 

 
' &

'

( )
$*



&

 

   



1.
+
&

#



&

 
&

 


,

(

 -

 -
-




.


/  &
0




( #
&  2.
Learned counsel would contend that the petitioner was an Exserviceman, had participated in a selection process, that came into being vide Advertisement dated 30.05.2023 for appointment against Group C & D posts, under his categoey of Ex-serviceman (General) and had scored 59.47 marks, while the cut-off for the said category is 48.80, however, his name does not find mention in the result, with regard to which, he though submitted a representation on 11.03.2024, however, does not have the copy thereof. In view of which, he thus, at this stage, on instructions from the petitioner states that a fresh representation shall be submitted, which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner. 3.
Notice of motion.

4.

At the asking of the Court,  
"


1 )
$$/
"

#  accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and on instructions submits that in case, a representation is filed within 1 week, the same shall be decided within a period of MOHIT 2024.09.05 12:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP-22303-2024 

4 weeks.

5.
+


 


 

-

 
  -


&

 

 2

& 

 (-#          ! " # 

3



&

4(5

 



5

1 3



&

7-



5

1 MOHIT 2024.09.05 12:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment