← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/28696/2019disposed of

Dharamvir Singh v. State Of Haryana And Others

2019-10-03Mr. Justice Amit Rawal2 pages

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.15 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-28696-2019 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-28696-2019 (O&M) Date of decision : 03.10.2019 Dharamvir Singh ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Saurabh Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) Petitioner is seeking indulgence of this Court for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant the same pay scale to the petitioner at par with the employee similarly situated in the government colleges/universities w.e.f. date of appointment of petitioner i.e. 15.09.1980 along with all consequential benefits and further writ directing the respondents to grant the pay parity to petitioner in accordance with the pay scales as granted by the Government to the employees similarly situated in the Government colleges/universities. In this regard, had submitted representation dated 20.07.2019 (Annexure P-6), but there is no adherence thereto.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.2-Higher Education Commissioner, Sector 4, Panchkula, Haryana, to consider the representation

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.15 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-28696-2019 (O&M) dated 20.07.2019 (Annexure P-6), within a stipulated period. Without going into the merits and demerits of the claim of the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2, to consider the representation dated 20.07.2019 (Annexure P-6) and decide the same within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, by passing a speaking order after affording opportunity of hearing to petitioner, failing which, respondent No.2, shall be liable to pay costs of `25,000/- to petitioner.

This condition of imposing costs is only to prevent petitioner to run from pillar to post and avail remedy of contempt in case of noncompliance of directions issued by this Court. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE 03.10.2019 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No