Bhagwani Devi And ORS v. Narain And ANR

RSA-1044-2013 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH RSA-1044-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 07, 2018 Bhagwani Devi and others ...Appellants

Versus

Narain and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

Present:

Mr. Madan Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate, for respondent No. 1.

ARUN PALLI, J. (ORAL) Having lost before both the Courts below, the plaintiffs are in second appeal. Concededly, in a suit filed by them, they prayed for a declaration that they have perfected their title by prescription/adverse possession. On being pointedly asked, as to how such a suit would at all be maintainable, for, such a plea could only be set up in defence, learned counsel for the appellants fails to point out any such provision or precedent in this regard.

That being so, no question of law, least any substantial question of law arises for consideration. The appeal being devoid of merit, is dismissed.

(ARUN PALLI) JUDGE May 07, 2018 Pkapoor Whether Speaking/Reasoned:

YES / NO Whether Reportable:

YES / NO Prashant Kapoor 2018.05.08 09:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document