Paramjit Singh @ Pamma v. State Of Punjab And Another
CRA-S-2611-2023 2023:PHHC:133171
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRA-S-2611-2023 Decided on: 12.10.2023 Paramjit Singh @ Pamma ...Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab and another
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present:
Mr. Rajesh Dhiman, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Shiva Khurmi, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Naresh Gopal Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2.
**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
FIR No.
Dated Police Station Sections 04.02.2023 Sadar Khanna, Police 452, 323, 506, 148, 149, 427 IPC District Khanna, (offence under Section 458 IPC & District Ludhiana Section 3 of SCSTPOA Act added later on) Criminal Case no.
CIS NO.4494 dated 13.03.2023 before trial Court CNR No.PBLD01-006049-2023 Date of order: 17.03.2023 1.
The limited question for which the appellant has come up before this Court for cancellation of bail granted to respondent No.2 vide order dated 11.04.2023 passed by this Court, is that without taking permission of the Court, the accused has travelled abroad.
2.
Mr. Naresh Gopal Sharma, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.2 and submits that it was only due to mis-communication and they have never intended to violate the order passed by this Court. He then submits that the respondent No.2 would return back positively as early as possible but not later that 31.12.2023. It is further submitted that in case, respondent No.2 fails to return back by the date fixed by this Court, then the State may proceed to cancel his passport. ANJU RANI 2023.10.16 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRA-S-2611-2023 2023:PHHC:133171 3.
Given such specific assurance by respondent No.2, he is directed to return back to India on or before 31.12.2023 positively and appear before the concerned police station. Failing which, State shall file an application for cancellation of bail and also for cancellation of passport. It shall also be permissible for the complainant to also file necessary application.
4.
Appeal is disposed of in the terms mentioned above. It is clarified that after returning, if respondent No.2 wants to travel abroad, he will seek prior permission from the Court. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 12.10.2023 anju rani Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes Whether reportable:
No.
ANJU RANI 2023.10.16 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document