Sarjeet v. Amit Kumar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.8086 of 2017 Date of decision: May 12th, 2026 Sarjeet .....Appellant

Versus

Amit Kumar and others .....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL

Present:

Mr. Neeraj, Advocate for Mr. Arvind Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate for respondent No.3.

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for the appellant is not aware as to what happened in the mediation proceedings in spite of the specific order passed by this Court.

2.

Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that in view of the same, present appeal be disposed of but liberty be granted to the appellant to revive the same after confirming as to what had happened in the mediation proceedings.

3.

Disposed of with aforesaid liberty.

May 12th, 2026 (VIKAS BAHL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.05.13 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh