Tarsem Singh v. State Of Punjab And Another
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:- 07.08.2024
....Petitioner(s)
Versus
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present :
Mr. Inderpal Singh, Advocate for Ms. Puja Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ankit Grewal, DAG Punjab.
***** SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) 1.
By way of present petition preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has sought quashing of impugned order dated 25.11.2022 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Court of learned
, Patiala whereby the petitioner was declared as proclaimed person in a complaint case bearing No.COMA/4898/2018 dated 20.09.2018 titled as 'HDFC Bank Limited Vs. Tarsem Singh etc.'
!
"
#" $# % & #"
% '( % "
#(&" #%
)* +) )*& ',% # -% & #"
%&&
"% # "$ "% %
. ''#"
% & #"
# #&,#$%
)/ +) )*-0%
',% & #"
%'
"( #""
('',% "
#
%$ %
-2- "( %% #(&" $%'
"0% 0"',% #(&"" 1
) )2 )2 * !
"
#" %"#& % $#
$(
"% # #$& #
"#")* +) )*-% $##0" #
0&
!
"# $% & '
(
)*+
,
- #
#
./.00" 1 In the meanwhile, petitioner is directed to surrender before the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned, within a period of 07 days from today. In that event, he is ordered to be released on interim bail on his furnishing personal/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned Court/Duty Magistrate. The petitioner will also furnish a specific undertaking that in future he will appear on each and every date of hearing without fail and only in case of extreme exigency will he seek exemption from the Court in accodance with law. He shall also abide by conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C."
/
&""1 0% $%% & #"
%
,&&
"% # "$ "% %
. '5
,'#"#" . "#%
#
)* +) )*& ',% # -% &
"& #"#0
-3- %
25.11.2022 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Court of learned , Patiala "% "
(' " 1
03.10.2023%
',#"$ ( 7.
The petition stands allowed.
8.
Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 07.08.2024 S.Sharma(syr) i) Whether speaking/reasoned?
Yes/No ii) Whether reportable?
Yes/No