Savita Yadav v. State Of Haryana And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH ***** CWP No.1710 of 2022 Date of Decision : 14.12.2023 Savita Yadav ..... Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. G.K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Rohit Arya, DAG, Haryana --- TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J. (ORAL):
The petition has been filed seeking a writ of certiorari setting aside the impugned order dated 9.11.2021, Annexure P-16, passed by respondent no.3, whereby petitioner's claim for granting benefits of twenty days' leave encashment, has been rejected. It is not disputed at the Bar that the claim raised in the petition has been given to the petitioner, vide office order dated 14.8.2023. In view of above, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and disposed of as such.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 14.12.2023 Aw Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No Ashwani Kumar 2023.12.16 13:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document