Krishna And ANR. v. Sukhbir And ORS.

  
    !   
























 "#$  $%&'&() * 






 










































+$,'-'

 

 








































 







!"#$
% 
!$ &

'   




(
 )* 
+


  +. / ,"0

-./0/.1

2
 

** 
 #

(
!


2
 
3 
  )
+

'



 3


* 
+
*


*
.--
+
 
% *
*(
.455
6+


* 7 



 
, ,

0-
2 


+



8)(
, 


6
"


$

$ 

*


27
+ 
8
#*
  3
3  9:4989/005

)
  2

 


.

:

 


3 
+


)   2
+
 

 

+ *
2
+

; * 
   



01:0/.-

'



 3
, 
,+
, )
'


%*2   3
3  9:.

<4..=

2
 

 , !

(
 
,
, 
,
*
2
 
++

3
) *


 
+
  *(

'



 
3)
 ; 

, 

& 

    (

, 
8*
*  
3


>$

.41

05:0/.-
,
3   $ 
* 
* 3 (
 
#


* 

 
* * 

** 
,
 
+


33 ) 3
+
 
++

3
) * , (
)


+
 
++

3
) *
,

; 2

) 2
 

 2
*

 
*




-=
2 3

 3

4///<9

 

+
,
 *
,
3



3
+



 3
*  

# 
#


*  3
 + *




,




-=
2 
+
3

  3
  * 
 
, 3
  
 2


-///<9( 


.<: *
+
+9? 


+
1
,  
# #


+

@(-.(///<9
 3
,  

 
+
1=A 


# *

0=(///<9
+
+ 
? 

=/(///<9
+

+
)
B
++*


B
++ 3 

* 
+


  
)

* 
 *
2

* 
+
 


3



 
 *

 


,
 C

+
 *

)




+

+
* 


+    
*

 *

-=
2 3




# 
*

+ 

)
 


** (

* 
, 


+
,
3

 
 3
+
 (
 
+
 *


*

 
 
, 3 
# 
 
, 3
)





 
 2
+ *


* 
# 
#


*

1 
+ *


 
+
-=
2 3
 2

3
 
2 
 
*

+
 
2
2 3
 

   2


-///<9


3





+
 + 3



 *
   
*

2

* 
+



,

3

3
+
+
 *


>) ! 3





 

    

 

  # 



 ''60. The controversy does not end here. The question still remains whether there should be no addition where the age of the deceased is more than 50 years. Sarla Verma thinks it appropriate not to add any amount and the same has been approved in Reshma Kumari. Judicial notice can be taken of the fact that salary does not remain the same. When a person is in a permanent job, there is always an enhancement due to one reason or the other. To lay down as a thumb rule that there will be no addition after 50 years will be an unacceptable concept. We are disposed to think, there should be an addition of 15% if the deceased is between the age of 50 to 60 years and there should be no addition thereafter. Similarly, in case of selfexmployed or person on fixed salary, the addition should be 10% between the age of 50 to 60 years. The aforesaid yardstick has been fixed so that there can be consistencey in the approach by the tribunals and the courts.

61. In view of the aforesaid analysis, we proceed to record our conclusions:- (i) The two-Judge Bench in Santosh Devi should have been well advised to refer the matter to a larger Bench as it was taking a different view than what has been stated in Sarla Verma, a judgment by a coordinate Bench. It is because a coordinate Bench of the same strength cannot take a contrary view than what has

2 been held by another coordinate Bench.

(ii) As Rajesh has not taken note of the decision in Reshma Kumari, which was delivered at earlier point of time, the decision in Rajesh is not a binding precedent. (iii) While determining the income, an addition of 50% of actual salary to the income of the deceased towards future prospects, where the deceased had a permanent job and was below the age of 40 years, should be made. The addition should be 30%, if the age of the deceased was between 40 to 50 years. In case the deceased was between the age of 50 to 60 years, the addition should be 15%. Actual salary should be read as actual salary less tax.

(iv) In case the deceased was self-employed or on a fixed salary, an addition of 40% of the established income should be the warrant where the deceased was below the age of 40 years. An addition of 25% where the deceased was between the age of 40 to 50 years and 10% where the deceased was between the age of 50 to 60 years should be regarded as the necessary method of computation. The established income means the income minus the tax component.

xx xx xx xx ''




 7 $
),
+
 
 

(

+  *




+
)
-/
2 3

 +
** 

3)

*






+
 +
* 


+
  
>
 
 
+



)



0=(///<9

+
+ 
? 

=/(///<9

+


B
++


+
)
B
++* 
$
,
  






  


* 
+
*  3
*

+


) * 
**


 ** 
+
 ;
  

D( 
#


*

+


++ 3 

*

* 
+
,"("3.$#4&5'%"'$'-6,"7


*



 


.=(///<9

+

+
 

+ 
? 

@/(///<9
+

+
* 



 


+

+
)

++* 

$+





+

+ 
?  (

+
)
B
++*


B
++ 3(


 *
 2(
 



1/(///<9
*


  ** 3

 




* 





+
+ 


*   

** 32
   
+. 

* 



   

 
  3< 





D <   
 






D <