Vimal Kaur And Others v. Kashmiri Lal And Others


 




 !"!#!$%!& '

 (  !"$)*)+!,!) &

  (  !"-./0)1&

2  (
 



3#   

 

 

 & 45 6666         





 
  !" 



  #

$ %%%% 66    & '          (             )    &* *+ ,*&+

(-  . ' (  /   1' (23    &44 

  &566       

 

&5 4* ***78 )  9+ :;   

   /)          
      &* *:

,*&4 ,



       

<   ) (- ' (   

      <  (     / (  -

6 666
565
6 $     8   

(- ' (  )    (       ' ( ) -

    /)   =4-

)    >?:

 

 ) =:-   '   -    ( )    (   ) =                8@    .

) -           -    AB#

4+:&8,*&+ # @  .




 

  )  

 

  ) -(/ '   -  

   :

@          )     ) (

 6557 6  2(     .

          Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another 8

96*-$!,!*$ #!#

:

  )) 

            8 C30
    

            

    

      

              

   

     

 

  
   

 

;

      

           

   

         !"#$           

%#  !"&$

  

&'   !"($      




31
)

       

      
*           (+,                  









  

  


-  

  

 

      

      

 $         
.  /

 

          

                
*  

 



           



               
32
 

         

        (+,         

    (+,     
             





 

         

'

               



 

        

  
* * * * * * 42. )     



    &$          0

 1   $        !2    !(%+ %! %(

$ 

    

 3!4 %'#+

3!'#!#(

3!(#'&+

3 !&&!&(

 3!#&'(+

 



   

 3!!(!((

35 (''+

34'!'(

 3(''4+

+  2( .

   National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. 8

969 :   )  &44 &4$8&46  
  &566   )

 8 03 D    

       ?      E 0"3        E 0.3    ( -  E 0D3 

(         

 -  

 

  ?

)  E 0>3 A 

 



    ) !

(E  8 -  ?  -

( '     !      8 C52. 6  conventional heads

    

   

 7/

8
*

    7
%(+++       

  7  !+++++  

   7 !+++++ 



 

   
    

      

   
7/

 0  9 

 





       



   

 

  



 

  
:    

      
6         
         

     



 

    


   

  

  

   


 ; 

       

       

  

     

     



   

  

         
    

   

*

   



        

 



 



        

    7
!(+++
&++++     7
!(+++  

 
       

      

  
<

    

   


)                         

   

 

   



  

    !+,    

)   

 



  

 



 
= = = = = 59.3
)   

  (+,   



 





 / 

  &+

  
 

 #+,  

  

&+(+

* 

  

 (+'+

   !(,
 6   

   


59.4
* 







 $ 

   &+,

 



  

    &+

6  %(,

  

  &+(+

 !+,

  

 (+'+

   

  
 

 

    

59.5
.              

         #+#%0> ?  



   
59.6. 



         

  0> @ &%/


59.7
  

       
59.8
7   

        

 



 

     

 7

!(+++7 &++++ 7 !(+++

 
 

    

  !+,  

A  2( .

   1,!)!$.)#*$)+!

,-)<50,0 !/3#)*,.0#=*=$*, =!$#8

6 ;

:     6$.3!$, #*-$ $)<6! =0 6*-$ 

)   

          8 B21
6  <

  C  0 8         

  

         

 ;

   

      

 


*  

D  D  

   



 D     D  D 

 D D  D
  

          





 

 

  



 
 )  

      

       

  



%!
!
Spousal consortium   

        

         

    



D  

   

     

 /  D
%!
%
Parental consortium      



              

   D    

   

     

   

     D
%!
#
Filial consortium             

  

 

   
6

      

           


  

   

    

     

             
22
  



 

     

      
3 /     

 

  

E     

 

       

   

  
3 /                

   

     
     

 

  

      


 23
 3>  

6  

    

      

  

 

   

* 

       

             

                


C       

     

    6 
6     

    

      

  

   

           

   






         

     

      




             

 !

!!!       
   )     8/)  )  ?-=:-    '      F8&8
     /)  ) =4-      )     

    (    ,& *= &5+& A  

         ) =:-    &* @ 

  ) (- 2( .

  Sunita Vs. Vinod Singh 2025 INSC 366)  2(?.

  (        -    ( 

     

   '  ?  

     8 B!!
      

  7
(2!5" 7

.   -     F

$    7
!++++" 7

   $           

   

 

 

  

 

7
(!#4" 7

.   ;

     $    



           

   7
%(++" 7

  .   $


 



7
4'#4" 7

0    0     $     
4+++" 7

0   $               

  &(

  C 3

7    



  




 



         

       

     
!  #+

 

!(

 

        

               

   

  

   

 %(#+

 

  !54+
Moreover, in the absence of material indicating to the contrary, there is no inhibition to accept the age of the deceased as per the Post2Mortem Report
 

    

  !&   &(

)  

  

 C 

 $  7
&++++" 7

.   $   

 !+, 



 

  

    3 G

* 


H
 F 7  %+!2$!20!#+       
          I7
&2+++"(J 

7
%&++++" 7

 H  .   $      



 


A && @ ) (

    !      /)   ) -

 =4-  

(=:-      

   &,       ' (   -

  -   

&:46*78 ' ' (

-&7= )  

?     

 -  A   ' (  )-    &$  &= '' ( 

 ) - 

)    

 

  A  ' (  ) )     )  

  

     ) '  )  <     .

  56 &$ @ ) ) )(- 2( .

  (

    ! 

    ) ')  &* *+ ,*&+

(-  . ' (  /  

     - '  8                 8@  .

-      8 8 Sr.

No.

Heads Compensation Awarded &  -@ 

&:46*78 , A 

 9,:;

$5,*780&:46*G,:;3 $ D    )   

 ? &7=

=5**780&54**G&7=3 = '

@ 

&=+**780&54**8=5**3 :

  &= D-

,= 4**780&=+**G&,G&=3 +

> 

&6 &:*78 A >?

,:

***78

.



, =:

,**78 A

=6 =**78?&  

=6 =**78?,  

&*****G&  .,-!)# 0) # >( >2( ?

!/*+ 0)  ) (-' ( # 2>9 >

?

)=)+!/,*) # >2 >2( ?

( 2(

;

&=            (- 2(  .

 Dara Singh @ Dhara Banjara Vs. Shyam Singh Varma 2;

R.Valli and Others VS. Tamil Nandu State Transport Corporation 

( 6*-$!,!*$ #!#

> 8     9 5;         

    H &:

   #

$8@    .

-         

     )  )' ()   )

     -  !  '' (     (          8     (/    '  8        (/      ' ( &4  

 - 





   66

   

  ( I    F  / 7 8 /  J 7#

F   (  J