← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/52679/2021dismissed

Vijay Garg v. Excise And Taxation Officer-Cum-Proper Officer

2022-02-03Mrs. Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Sr. No.215 CRM-M No.52679 of 2021 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.02.2022 Vijay Garg ..Petitioner

Versus

Excise and Taxation Officer-cum-Proper ..Respondent Officer (State Tax), Haryana State GST Intelligence Unit, Gurugram, Haryana and another (Heard through Video-Conferencing) BEFORE: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Sr. Advocate along-with Mr. Aman Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.

*** MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA J. (Oral) CRM No. 232 of 2022 This application has been moved with a prayer to implead State of Haryana as respondent No.2 in the main petition bearing Crl. Misc. No. M-52679 of 2021.

Notice in the application.

Ms. Ambika Sood, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, who has joined the proceedings on behalf of the respondent as well as the proposed respondent in pursuance of the copy of this application having been sent to the respondent-State in advance, accepts the notice and submits that she has no objection in allowing this application.

POOJA SHARMA 2022.02.03 16:40 I attest to the accuracy of this document

CRM-M No.52679 of 2021 (O&M) -2Keeping in view the above-said fact as well as the reason as mentioned in the instant application, the same is allowed as prayed for. Amended memo of parties is already available on the file and the same is taken on the record.

Crl. Misc. No. M-52679 of 2021 However, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition at this stage.

Learned counsel for the respondent-State has no objection for the same.

Resultantly, the petition in hand stands dismissed for having been withdrawn accordingly.

03.02.2022 (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) pooja JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No POOJA SHARMA 2022.02.03 16:40 I attest to the accuracy of this document