← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/27788/2019disposed of

Anoop Singh And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS

2019-10-22Mr. Justice Amit Rawal2 pages

CWP No.27788 of 2019 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.27788 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision.22.10.2019 Anoop Singh and another

...Petitioners

Vs State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

Present:

Dr. Suresh Kumar Redhu, Advocate for the petitioners.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL -.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present writ petition is for quashing of seniority list dated 02.08.2018/21.12.2017 (Annexure P-3 colly) and re-fix the same keeping in view judgment (Annexure P-2).

I am of the view that grievance of the petitioners cannot be redressed at this stage, for, they have not made any grievance or objection to seniority list, much less, representation.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that his clients undertake to make objection/representation within a period of one week from today.

In case, such representation is made by the petitioners to respondent No.4-The Superintendent of Police, Rohtak as undertaken by them, respondent No.4 shall consider the same after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and pass a speaking order thereon, failing which respondent No.4 shall be liable to pay costs of `25,000/- to the petitioners. This condition of imposing costs is only to prevent petitioners to run from pillar to post and avail remedy of contempt PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.10.30 15:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No.27788 of 2019 (O&M) -2in case of non-compliance of directions issued by this Court. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE October 22, 2019 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.10.30 15:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document