Rajiv Kumar v. The Union Territory Of Chandigarh Through Its Advisor To The Administrator, Chandigarh Secretariat

ANA AT CHANDIGARH

IN THE HIGH

Sr. No. 208 H COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYA CWP-21832-2024 Date of decision : 13.02.2026 Rajiv Kumar .....Petitioner

Versus

The Union Territo CORAM : HON HON Present :

None ory of Chandigarh and others ..... Respondents N'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK N'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA B SIBAL BANERJI e for the petitioner.

Mr. A for th Anil Sharma, Advocate, he respondent(s)-UT, Chandigarh h.

* * * * * , J. (Oral) DEEPAK SIBAL, 1.

As p per office report, learned coun nsel for the parties had been informed that the present petition is listed for he earing today but in spite of the same, none appear rs on behalf of the petitioner.

2.

Dism missed in default.

13.02.2026 shamsher [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes / No Whether reportable :

Yes / No [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE o o SHAMSHER SINGH 2026.02.17 12:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh