Pooja And ANR v. State Of Haryana And Others

CRWP-8948-2023 2023:PHHC:119873

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No.8948 of 2023 Date of decision: 13.09.2023 Pooja and another ....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present :

Mr. Deepak Kumar Bartia, Advocate for the petitioners. ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY. J.

1.

The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos.4 to 6, as they have attained majority and married against the wishes of their family members.

2.

Learned counsel states that the petitioners will be satisfied if the Commissioner of Police, Panchkula i.e. respondent No.2 is directed to look into the representation dated 06.09.2023 (Annexure P-6), made to him by them and take appropriate action on the same. 3.

As per the averments made, both the petitioners are major and their dates of birth are 15.06.1995 and 15.02.1997, respectively. Copy of Aadhar Card of petitioner No.1 and copy of PAN Card of petitioner No.2 are appended as Annexures P-1 and P-2, respectively. They got married on 27.08.2023 and the Marriage Certificate is enclosed Ankur Goyal 2023.09.13 15:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment

CRWP-8948-2023 2023:PHHC:119873 with the petition as Annexure P-4. Photographs of the marriage are Annexure P-5.

4.

Notice of motion.

5.

At the asking of the Court, Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Addl. AG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and has no objection in deciding the representation filed on behalf of the petitioners. 6.

In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of their claim, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 06.09.2023 (Annexure P-6) and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law.

7.

It is however, made clear that this order shall not preclude the authorities to proceed against the petitioners, in case, they are found involved in any other criminal proceedings, instituted/pending against them if there is some evidence that surfaces regarding their involvement in a cognizable offence, for which they may be required by the investigating agency.

(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 13.09.2023 Ankur Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Ankur Goyal 2023.09.13 15:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment