Sunita Rani v. Bhakhra Beas Management Board And ORS
!" #$%$!&
'(
(
) * )++ )
+ ,-+()+ )-
!"#$
% &&&& + )- .(/0
' $
( ' )
* + " " **, " ( ))"
- **.* /0" 1 2 *3.
*.**/0" 1,2 .-.4*.* /0" 1
25 $') 6") ' $
Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that respondent has rejected application of the petitioner seeking maternity leave on the ground that maternity leave is not available for 3rd child. The petitioner at the time of joining service was already having two kids. The
3rd kid has born from 2nd marriage of the petitioner and after joining respondent-department. The case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgments of this Court in Ruksana Vs. State of Haryana and others 2011 (5) SLR 325, Jyoti Suhag vs. State of Haryana (CWP No.3652 of 2015 decided on 15.05.2015) and Smt. Chitra Rani vs. State of Haryana and others (CWP No.18236 of 2015, decided on 18.11.2015). % "
"$) ' $ ) $'7 8 9 "
5 : ( 9 "
!"
# $
" " %&'() *(( - ;$ ( "
0
$'
$'7 8#"
) 5 8#"
) " + '
#"
)
$' " ) ,
"
" 7 8#"
)
" 5
$ 9<$"
)" $'9 ' =)$ )
7 8 "
>"
8 " 0 $
) $' 5 $ #"
' ' " $" 5 #"
)7 8 8#"
) "
#"
) 9 "
6" ' $'7 8 5 8#"
)
" $5 '
5 +) " $'
0 $) ' /+ )-2
,
*.*
( ? @ ?