Simarjeet Kaur v. Gurpreet Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.207 Date of Decision: 19.03.2025 SIMARJEET KAUR ....Applicant

Versus

GURPREET SINGH .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Liaqat Ali, Advocate for the applicant.

None for the respondent.

***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) As observed in the order dated 12.12.2024, despite service, the respondent did not make appearance on that date. Even today, none has made appearance on his behalf. As such, the respondent is proceeded against ex parte.

The counsel for the applicant heard.

 

 

   

          

 


  "#

 

" !    $%#& !$ "           %      &    % 

 '  

(  ) "%

"#     

  %

     !   "    

*  

#      #  

+  

 % %  !    
 

  ,   -

     & 

(   %    ! "%

 

 

      !  ,  #        #   

     

  %#   )    ,

 %  ! "%

       

  %%    " -%       

   In view of the submissions aforesaid, considering the position of law about preference to be given to the convenience of the wife in the transfer applications relating to the matrimonial dispute, more particularly, considering the fact about the respondent not having come forward to resist the application and also considering the fact about the applicant taking care of the minor daughter, the transfer application is allowed and 

                    

!  
 

       "#   

" !

    % $%#& !$ "!  &  % 

'  (  
.    "

"# $%#& !$ "!  /     0!( 

( /    0!( !     $%#& !( 1,     " $%#& !( !   %

 % #

 (ARCHANA PURI) 19.03.2025 JUDGE Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

Yes/No