Neelam v. State Of Haryana And Another




    
   

 
 (I) CWP-22600-2024 Neelam vs. State of Haryana and Another (II) CWP-22603-2024 Sumitra vs. State of Haryana and Another (III) CWP-22612-2024 Savita vs. State of Haryana and Another (IV) CWP-22634-2024 Baby vs. State of Haryana and Another      
      


 

 



       



1.
These cases involve similar issues and therefore, are being disposed of together by this common order.

 !
"




  
  



  #

    $     

 # 

  


   
 %



 

%  






  &  
'



  3.
Learned counsel would contend that the petitioners have been working as a part-time sweepers more than 16 years, however, despite there being instructions in their favour, they have not been granted regularisation. Their cases are squarely covered by the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in State of Haryana and Others vs. Jai Bhagwan in LPA-1892-2019 and other connected appeals, decided on 26.07.2024. In this regard, representations dated 24.07.2024, Annexure P-2, have been submitted by them, but the same have yet not evoked any response. He thus, at this stage, on instructions from the MOHIT 2024.09.09 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP-22600-2024 and other connected cases -2petitioners, prays that a direction be given to the respondents to decide the same, keeping in view the aforesaid judgment in a time bound manner. 4.
Notice of motion.

5.

At the asking of the Court, 
(
)

(" accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and has no objection to the limited prayer made.

6.
In view of the above and without commenting on the merits of the case, these petitions are hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representation dated 24.07.2024, taking note of the aforereferred judgment, within a period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to them and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioners shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon * 


 "


 
'









  

          

  !

+% ,  
 -#.  


/ 

.

)

,  


 '


/ 

.

)

MOHIT 2024.09.09 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment