← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/28212/2019disposed of

Priyanka v. State Of Haryana And Another

2019-09-30Mr. Justice Amit Rawal2 pages

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.14 13:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-28212-2019 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-28212-2019 (O&M) Date of decision : 30.09.2019 Priyanka ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Vikas Lochab, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) Petitioner is seeking indulgence of this Court for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to allocate/assigned the nearest station (which is vacant) to the petitioner as at the time of appointment given by the respondents, no cluster was allotted to the petitioner due to some technical/IT problem in the portal of the department. In this regard, had submitted representation dated 16.09.2019 (Annexure P-9), but there is no adherence thereto. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.2-Director State Project, Haryana School Shiksha Priyojna Prishad, Haryana, to consider the representation dated 16.09.2019 (Annexure P-9), within a stipulated period. Without going into the merits and demerits of the claim of the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2, to consider the representation dated 16.09.2019 (Annexure P-9), within a period of fifteen

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.14 13:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-28212-2019 (O&M) days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and shall pass a speaking order thereon after affording opportunity of hearing to petitioner, failing which, respondent No.2, shall be liable to pay costs of `25,000/- to petitioner.

This condition of imposing costs is only to prevent petitioner to run from pillar to post and avail remedy of contempt in case of noncompliance of directions issued by this Court. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE 30.09.2019 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No