Suneeti Aarya v. State Of Haryana & ORS.

LPA No.1096 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.1096 of 2017 in CWP No.11427 of 2017 Date of Decision.17.10.2018 Suneeti Aarya ...Appellant Vs State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. R.K. Malik, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sunil Hooda, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Samarth Sagar, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.3.

Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocate for Mr. Salil Sabhlok, Advocate for respondent No.4.

-.- MAHESH GROVER J. (ORAL) Pursuant to our order dated 03.07.2017, the petitioner has been considered provisionally. The result has been produced before us in a sealed cover and opened. It reveals that appellant has obtained 61.16 marks. A photocopy of the same is taken on record. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 states that the last candidate selected has 69.65 marks. If that be so then the appellant does not make the grade.

Learned counsel for the appellant, when confronted with the situation states that in view of the result, the appeal may be PANKAJ KUMAR 2018.10.30 13:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

LPA No.1096 of 2017 -2dismissed as such.

Ordered accordingly.

(MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE October 17, 2018 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PANKAJ KUMAR 2018.10.30 13:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document