Commanding Officer v. Mania & ORS

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Reserved On: 22.04.2025 Pronounced On: 07.05.2025 Commanding Officer, 69, Road Construction, Coy. (GREF), C/o 56 APO ... Appellant(s)

Versus

Mania and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. Shivoy Dhir, Senior Panel Counsel for Union of India-appellant.

Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, Senior Panel Counsel for Union of India.

Mr. Anil Chawla, Senior Panel Counsel for Union of India-appellant (In RFA-6123-2015 to RFA-6140-2015, RFA-373-2016, RFA-881-2016 to RFA-885-2016, RFA-1050-2016, RFA-1051-2016, RFA-3111-2017 to RFA-3121-2017).

Mr. R.M.Sharma, Advocate for the respondent(s) (In RFA-7647-2014, RFA-4587-2015 to RFA-4589-2015, RFA-459-2015, RFA-4593-2015, RFA-45942015, RFA-4596-2015 to RFA-4598-2015, RFA-6123-2015 to RFA-6140-2015, RFA-875-2016 to RFA-878-2016, RFA-880-2016 to RFA-883-2016, RFA-899-2016, RFA-900-2016 and RFA-903-2016).

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

1.

Brief Facts of the Case 1.1 With the consent of the learned counsel representing the parties, a batch of 81 connected appeals (the details whereof are at the foot of the judgment) shall stand disposed of by this common order. This Court has

been called upon to assess the market value of the acquired land in all these appeals.

1.2 The necessary and relevant details of the acquisition are as under:- S.No.

Date Particulars 1.

19.04.2010 Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1894 Act") was published proposing to acquire the land measuring 405 kanalas 10 marlas located in villages Dunera Khas, Dunder Tika Maroh, Ghar Tika Bhagroli, Ghar Tika Barnoh, Dukhnali Khas, Dukhnali Tika Lajoga, Durban Khas and Sarti Tika Naloh, Tehsil Dhar Kalan, District Pathankot, for four laning Dunera- DukhnaliRavi Bridge to National Highway Road. 2.

12.09.2011 The Land Acquisition Collector (hereinafter referred to as "LAC" ) vide Award No.1 offered to pay the following amount to the landowners:- Sr. No. Name of villages Kind of land Rate per marla (In ₹) 1.

Dunera Khas Barani 1,037/- 2.

Ghair Majrha 445/- 3.

Ghair Mumkin Abadi 19,500/- 4.

Mili Juli Makhloot 1,325/- 5.

Commercial 66,000/- 6.

Others 475/- 7.

Dunera Tika Maroh Chahi 1,384/- 8.

Barani 975/- 9.

Ghair Majruha 402/- 10.

Ghair Mumkin Abadi 19,500/- 11.

Commercial 66,000/- 12.

Others 475/- 13.

Darban Khas Chahi 950/- 14.

Barani 900/- 15.

Ghair Majruha 429/- 16.

Ghair Mumkin Abadi 8,000/- 17.

Milijuli Makhloot 407/- 18.

Commercial 66,000/- 19.

Others 400/- 20.

Dukhniali Chahi 825/- 21.

Barani 775/- 22.

Ghair Majruha 416/- 23.

Ghair Mumkin Abadi 8,000/-

S.No.

Date Particulars Sr. No. Name of villages Kind of land Rate per marla (In ₹) 24.

Milijuli Makhloot 500/- 25.

Commercial 10,000/- 26.

Others 400/- 27.

Dukhniali Tika Lajoga Chahi 825/- 28.

Barani 775/- 29.

Ghair Majruha 116/- 30.

Ghair Mumkin Abadi 8,000/- 31.

Milijuli Makhloot 500/- 32.

Commercial 10,000/- 33.

Others 400/- 34.

Ghar Tika Bhagroli Chahi 825/- 35.

Barani 1,316/- 36.

Ghair Majruha 781/- 37.

Ghair Mumkin Abadi 8,000/- 38.

Commercial 12,000/- 39.

Others 450/- 40.

Ghar Tika Barnoh Baani 1,551/- 41.

Ghair Majruha 408/- 42.

Ghair Mumkin Abadi 8,000/- 43.

Commercial 10,000/- 44.

Others 400/- 45.

Sarti Tika Tanoh Chahi 1,000/- 46.

Barani 950/- 47.

Ghair Majruha 325/- 48.

Ghair Mumkin Abadi 9,000/- 49.

Milijuli Makhloot 569/- 50.

Commercial 12,000/- 51.

Others 1.3 The Reference Court (hereinafter referred to as "RC") has decided these cases in the following 32 batches:- Sr. No. Date of Award Passed by the RC Name of the Village(s) 1.

15.04.2015 Dunera Tika Maroh 2.

27.04.2015 3.

06.05.2015 4.

10.08.2015 5.

01.09.2015 6.

06.05.2015 Ghar Tika Bhagroli

7.

10.08.2015 8.

01.09.2015 9.

11.10.2013 Dukhnaili 10.

19.10.2013 11.

03.01.2015 12.

15.04.2015 13.

06.05.2015 14.

10.08.2015 15.

09.10.2013 Darban Khas 16.

10.10.2013 17.

11.10.2013 18.

01.02.2014 19.

27.04.2015 20.

06.05.2015 21.

03.07.2015 22.

10.08.2015 23.

06.02.2016 24.

15.04.2015 Ghar Tika Barnoh 25.

27.04.2015 26.

06.05.2015 27.

10.08.2015 28.

01.09.2015 29.

27.04.2015 Sarti Tika Tanoh 30.

06.05.2015 31.

01.09.2015 Garh Tika Bhagroli, Gair Tika Barnoh, Dunera Tika Maroh 32.

01.09.2015 Gair Tika Barnoh and Dunera Tika Maroh 1.4 80 appeals have been filed by the beneficiary namely Commanding Officer, 62, Road Construction, Coy. GREF C/o 56 A.P.O. whereas a single appeal has been filed by Chain Singh, the landowner, who has been deprived of the enhanced compensation on the ground that he has not led any evidence.

2.

Evidences Adduced 2.1 In all these batches, the landowners have examined the following witnesses, in oral evidence:-

Sr. No.

Date of Award passed by RC Witness Number Name of Witness LAC Case No.

Village Dunera Teeka Maroh 1.

15.04.2015 AW-1 Sidharth Pathania 70/2013 2.

15.04.2015 AW-1 Sidharth Pathania 68/2013 3.

27.04.2015 AW-1 Mann Singh 33/2015 4.

01.09.2015 AW-1 Rasal Singh 82/2014, 5.

01.09.2015 AW-1 Rasal Singh 80/2014 6.

10.08.2015 AW-1 Dinesh 65/2013 7.

06.05.2015 AW-1 Amarnath 21/2012 8.

01.09.2015 AW-1 Pradeep Singh 79/2014 9.

01.09.2015 AW-1 Tilak Dev 78/2014 10.

15.04.2015 AW-1 Sidharth Pathania 72/2013 Village Dukhnaili 11.

11.10.2013 PW-1 Dhayan Singh 51/2012 12.

11.10.2013 PW-1 Bidhi Singh 79/2012 13.

10.08.2015 AW-1 Kashmir Singh 77/2013 14.

03.01.2015 PW-1 Hansraj 14/2012 15.

09.10.2013 PW-1 Harpal Singh 16/2012 16.

11.10.2013 PW-1 Dhayan Singh 51/2012 17.

15.04.2015 AW-1 Subash Singh 34/2014 18.

06.05.2015 AW-1 Deepak Kumar 22/2012 19.

06.05.2015 AW-1 Onkar Singh 24/2012 20.

06.05.2015 AW-1 Badri Nath 18/2012 21.

06.05.2015 AW-1 Changan Singh 26/2012 22.

06.05.2015 AW-1 Labh Singh 25/2012 Village Ghar Teeka Barnoh 23.

10.08.2015 AW-1 Dinesh 56/2013 24.

01.09.2015 AW-1 Kamla Devi 81/2014 25.

01.09.2015 AW-1 Pradeep Singh 79/2014 26.

15.04.2015 AW-1 Bhuri Singh 67/2013 27.

15.04.2015 AW-1 Jai Kishan 31/2013 28.

01.09.2015 AW-1 Tilak Dev 78/2014 29.

15.04.2015 AW-1 Amar Nath 71/2013 30.

06.05.2015 AW-1 Prakash Singh 57/2013 31.

06.05.2015 AW-1 Narender Singh 66/2013 32.

27.04.2015 AW-1 Mann Singh 29/2012 33.

15.04.2015 AW-1 Narender Singh 69/2013 34.

27.04.2015 AW-1 Hans Raj 31/2012 Village Darban Khas 36.

01.02.2014 PW-1 Rashpal Singh 22/2012 37.

10.10.2013 PW-1 Anita Devi 26/2012 38.

09.10.2013 PW-1 Des Raj 12/2012 39.

11.10.2013 PW-1 Subash Chander 48/2012 40.

06.02.2016 AW-1 Varinder Kumar 143/2015 41.

27.04.2015 AW-1 Chatter Singh 14/2012 42.

06.05.2015 AW-1 Jagdish Mittal 34/2013 43.

27.04.2015 AW-1 Santokh Singh 15/2012 44.

27.04.2015 AW-1 Varinder Kumar 17/2012 45.

06.05.2015 AW-1 Madan Lal 19/2012 Village Ghar Teeka Bagroli 46.

01.09.2015 AW-1 Jaipal Singh 83/2014 47.

10.08.2015 AW-1 Prakash Singh 61/2013 48.

01.09.2015 AW-1 Dalak Singh 80/2014 49.

01.09.2015 AW-1 Tilak Dev 78/2014

Sr. No.

Date of Award passed by RC Witness Number Name of Witness LAC Case No.

50.

06.05.2015 AW-1 Prakash Singh 64/2015 51.

06.05.2015 AW-1 Mangat Ram 52/2013 52.

06.05.2015 AW-1 Kartar Singh 60/2013 53.

06.05.2015 AW-1 Prakash Singh 51/2013 54.

06.05.2015 AW-1 Mangat Ram 58/2013 55.

06.05.2015 AW-1 Tilak Raj 59/2013 Village Darban 56.

06.05.2015 AW-1 Dev Raj 28/2012 Village Sarti Teeka Tanoh 57.

06.05.2015 AW-1 Chaman Singh 23/2012 58.

27.04.2015 AW-1 Gobind Singh 13/2012 59.

06.05.2015 AW-1 Hans Raj 20/2012 60.

27.04.2015 AW-1 Kartar Singh 12/2012 2.2 Per contra, the beneficiary or the State examined the following witnesses:- Sr. No.

Date of Award passed by RC Witness Number Name of Witness LAC Case No.

Village Dunera Tika Maroh 1.

15.04.2015 RW-1 Rakesh Pathak 70/2013 2.

15.04.2015 RW-1 Rakesh Pathak 68/2013 3.

27.04.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 33/2015 4.

01.09.2015 RW-1 Smt. Param 82/2014 5.

10.08.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 65/2013 6.

06.05.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 21/2012 7.

01.09.2015 RW-1 Smt. Param 79/2014 8.

01.09.2015 RW-1 Smt. Param, Sr.

Assistant 78/2014 9.

15.04.2015 RW-1 Rakesh Pathak 72/2013 Village Dukhnaili 10.

11.10.2013 RW-1 Smt. Balwinder Kaur 51/2012 11.

11.10.2013 RW-1 Smt. Balwinder Kaur 79/2012 12.

10.08.2015 RW-1 Smt. Param 77/2013 13.

03.01.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 14/2012 14.

09.10.2013 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 16/2012 15.

11.10.2013 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 51/2012 16.

15.04.2015 RW-1 Rakesh Pathak 34/2014 17.

06.05.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 22/2012 18.

06.05.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Singh 24/2012 19.

06.05.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 18/2012 20.

06.05.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 26/2012 21.

06.05.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 25/2012 Village Ghar Teeka Barnoh 22.

10.08.2015 RW-1 Smt. Balwinder Kaur 56/2013 23.

01.09.2015 RW-1 Smt. Param 81/2014 24.

01.09.2015 RW-1 Smt. Param 79/2014 25.

15.04.2015 RW-1 Rakesh Pathak, 67/2013

Sr. No.

Date of Award passed by RC Witness Number Name of Witness LAC Case No.

Sr. Assistant 26.

15.04.2015 RW-1 Rakesh Pathak, Sr. Assistant 31/2013 27.

01.09.2015 RW-1 Smt. Param, Sr.

Assistant 78/2014 28.

15.04.2015 RW-1 Rakesh Pathak 71/2013 29.

06.05.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 57/2013 30.

06.05.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 66/2013 31.

27.04.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Singh 29/2012 32.

15.04.2015 RW-1 Rakesh Pathak 69/2013 33.

06.05.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Singh 27/2012 34.

27.04.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 31/2012 Village Darban Khas 35.

01.02.2014 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 22/2012 36.

10.10.2013 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 26/2012 37.

09.10.2013 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 12/2012 38.

11.10.2013 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 48/2012 39.

03.07.2015 RW-1 Param 73/2012 40.

06.02.2016 RW-1 Naib Sub Devindra Kumar Dass 143/2015 41.

27.04.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Singh 14/2012 42.

06.05.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 34/2013 43.

27.04.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Singh 15/2012 44.

27.04.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 17/2012 45.

06.05.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 19/2012 Village Ghar Teeka Bagroli 46.

01.09.2015 RW-1 Smt. Param 83/2014 47.

10.08.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 61/2013 48.

01.09.2015 RW-1 Param 80/2014 49.

01.09.2015 RW-1 Smt. Param, Sr.

Assistant 78/2014 50.

06.05.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 64/2015 51.

06.05.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 52/2013 52.

06.05.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Singh 60/2013 53.

06.05.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 51/2013 54.

06.05.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 58/2013 55.

06.05.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 59/2013 Village Darban 56.

06.05.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 28/2012 Village Sarti Teeka Tanoh 57.

06.05.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 23/2012 58.

27.04.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Singh 13/2012 59.

06.05.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Kaur 20/2012 60.

27.04.2015 RW-1 Balwinder Singh 12/2012 2.3 In all these appeals, in the documentary evidence, the landowners have produced the sale deed (Ex.A6) dated 30.08.2011 with respect to a small plot measuring 16 marlas. In these cases, the market value of the acquired land is to be assessed as on 19.04.2011.

3.

Reasons recorded by the Reference Court (RC) 3.1 The landowners have also relied upon the awards passed (Ex.A2 to Ex.A5) with respect to the acquisition of the land for PathankotAmritsar Road (four-laning). The RC has held that these awards reflect the acquisition of land which is located at a distance of 20 kms. of the acquired land. Moreover, for Pathankot-Amritsar Road, the plain land has been acquired, whereas vide notification dated 19.04.2010, the land from hilly area has been acquired. Ultimately, in all these cases, the RC has relied upon the market value assessed by the High Court in RFA-1772-2011 Purshotam and Others v. State of Punjab and Others, assessing the market value @ ₹1,600/- per marla on the date of notification under Section 4 i.e. 17.08.1995. This land was acquired for establishment of reservoir of Ranjit Sagar Dam Project. In all these cases, no evidence to prove that the trees and building structures were existing on the acquired land has been produced.

3.2 The RC proceeded to assess the market value of the acquired land by granting increase @ 12% per annum for a period of 15 years 4 month i.e. gap between 17.08.1995 to 19.04.2010. Thus, the Court assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ₹4,544/- and ₹4,500/- as market value along with all the statutory benefits. As already noticed, in one case i.e. Regular First Appeal No. 373 of 2016, the reference petition has been dismissed.

4.

Arguments Addressed 4.1 The learned counsel representing the appellant(s), the Commanding Officer(s) in 80 appeals have contended that the manner in

which the RC has assessed the market value by granting increase @ 12% per annum for a period of more than 15 years is wrong in view of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in The General Manager, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Limited v. Rameshbhai Jivanbhai Patel (2008) 14 SCC 745.

4.2 The learned counsel representing the landowners has contended that in the absence of any other evidence, the RC has no choice but to assess the market value in this manner. It is submitted that after the acquisition of land for reservoir of Ranjit Sagar Dam Project and the construction of Ranjit Sagar Dam in the year 1995, there was increase in the commercial activity and the prices of the land increased by metes and bounds. It is submitted that the land had great potential for being used for the purpose of commercial and residential purpose because the entire land was located near the existing road because the land has been acquired for four-laning.

5.

Analysis and Discussion 5.1 This Court has considered the submissions of the learned counsel representing the parties and perused the paper-books along with the requisitioned record.

5.2 On a court question, the learned counsel representing the beneficiary of the acquisition has admitted that the payment of the compensation has already been made to the landowners. In Rameshbhai Jivanbhai Patel's case (supra), the Court has held that assessing the market value of the acquired land by assuming increase for a period of more than four to five years is inappropriate. However, as already noticed, in this

case, no other evidence has been produced. There is a positive finding of the RC that the land acquired vide notification dated 19.04.2004 adjoins the land acquired vide notification dated 17.08.1995. No effort has been made by the learned counsel representing the beneficiary of the acquisition to challenge the correctness of such findings. The learned counsel representing the landowners have also not challenged the correctness of the findings given by the RC with reference to Ex.A2 to Ex.A5. The sale instance (Ex.A6) dated 30.08.2011 is not only with respect to a smaller plot but also post 19.04.2010 notification.

5.3 Furthermore, this Court does not approve the manner in which the market value has been assessed by the RC because of the following two reasons:- I) The gap period calculated in majority of cases is 15 years 4 months, whereas it should be 14 years 8 months. II) The assessment of the market value for a period of more than four to five years for the base year on the basis of presumption of increase at a particular percentage per year is inappropriate.

5.4 However, this Court, as already noticed, is faced with a situation where the amount has already been paid and there is small difference in the calculation of the amount. In majority of batches, the market value has been assessed @ ₹4,544/- per marla, whereas in some of the cases, the market value has been assessed @ ₹4,500/-. There is no reason to pay different amount with respect to acquired land of identical market value. It will be difficult for the beneficiary of the acquisition to

recover the amount from the landowners who were paid in the years 2014, 2015, 2016. Hence, this Court finds it appropriate to assess the market value at the uniform rate of ₹4,544/- per marla by increasing the market value from ₹4,544/- in the some of the appeals where the market value has been assessed @ ₹4,500/- per marla.

5.5 In Regular First Appeal No. 373 of 2016, out of land comprised in khasra No.792/226 (8-18), the land measuring 2 kanals belonging to Chain Singh, appellant, was acquired which is not disputed by the beneficiary of the acquisition. The RC proceeded to assess the market value of the acquired land on the basis of previous judgment. In this case also, the RC, on 03.07.2015, should have assessed the market value at the same rate because the same was assessed in various other awards passed on 09.10.2013, 10.10.2013, 11.10.2013, 03.01.2014, 01.02.2014, 15.04.2015, 27.04.2015.

5.6 Hence, Chain Singh is also held entitled to the market value of the acquired land measuring 2 kanals @ ₹4,544/- per marla. He shall be entitled to all the statutory benefits as per the amended 1894 Act. It would be noted here that this judgment shall not be treated as a precedent because the manner in which the market value has been assessed by the RC is not correct. Except Chain Singh, the other landowners have not filed appeal, hence, the amount already paid to the landowners is maintained. 6.

Decision 6.1 Keeping in view the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case, the appeals filed by the beneficiary of the acquisition are dismissed, whereas the Regular First Appeal No. 373 of 2016, filed by the

landowner, namely Chain Singh, shall stand allowed. 6.2 The miscellaneous application(s) pending, if any, in all the appeals, shall stand disposed of.

(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge May 07, 2025 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Sr. No.

Case No.

Party's Name 1.

RFA-876-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Sadresh Singh & Others 2.

RFA-877-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Mehar Singh And Others 3.

RFA-878-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Harnam Singh And Others 4.

RFA-880-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Jaipal Singh & Others 5.

RFA-881-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Kamla Devi & Others 6.

RFA-882-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Dinesh & Others 7.

RFA-883-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Avtar Singh & Others 8.

RFA-884-2016 Commanding Officervs. Kashmir Singh & Others 9.

RFA-885-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Dinesh Sharma & Others 10.

RFA-886-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Dinesh & Others 11.

RFA-887-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Malkiat Singh & Others 12.

RFA-888-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Bharat Bhushan & Others 13.

RFA-889-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Dinesh & Others 14.

RFA-890-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Tilak Singh & Others 15.

RFA-891-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Teju & Others 16.

RFA-892-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Kanta Devi & Others 17.

RFA-893-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Hans Raj & Others 18.

RFA-894-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Changan Singh & Others 19.

RFA-895-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Parkash Singh & Others 20.

RFA-896-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Bhima & Others 21.

RFA-897-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Mangat Ram & Others 22.

RFA-898-2016 Commanding Officer Vs.Milkhi Ram & Others 23.

RFA-899-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Baldev Raj Kaushal & Others 24.

RFA-900-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Gram Panchayat & Others 25.

RFA-901-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Kartar Singh & Others 26.

RFA-902-2016 Commanding Officervs. Jagdish Mittar & Others 27.

RFA-903-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Sarandas & Others 28.

RFA-904-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Deepak Kumar & Others 29.

RFA-905-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Tilak Raj And Others 30.

RFA-906-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Bachitter Singh & Others 31.

RFA-907-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Ravinder Singh & Others

Sr. No.

Case No.

Party's Name 32.

RFA-908-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Badri Nath & Others 33.

RFA-4587-2014 Commanding Officer Vs. Dhian Singh 34.

RFA-4588-2014 Commanding Officer Vs. Dummi And Others.

35.

RFA-4589-2014 Commanding Officer Vs. Anita Devi And Others 36.

RFA-4590-2014 Commanding Officer Vs.Ramesh Lal And Others 37.

RFA-4591-2014 Commanding Officer Vs. Ashwani Kumar 38.

RFA-4592-2014 Commanding Officer Vs. Ram Kishan And Others 39.

RFA-4593-2014 Commanding Officer Vs. Bidhi Singh And Others 40.

RFA-4594-2014 Commanding Officer Vs. Krishna Devi 41.

RFA-4595-2014 Commanding Officer Vs. Tilak Raj & Others 42.

RFA-4596-2014 Commanding Officer Vs. Rajnish Kumar & Others 43.

RFA-4597-2014 Commanding Officer Vs. Pritam Singh & Others 44.

RFA-4598-2014 Commanding Officer Vs. Dharam Singh 45.

RFA-5807-2014 Commandingh Officer 69 Road Const. Coy (Gref) Vs. Dhian Singh 46.

RFA-6886-2014 Commanding Officer Vs. Deso @ Des Raj And Others 47.

RFA-7647-2014 Commanding Officer Vs. Santa Ram And Others 48.

RFA-6123-2015 Commanding Officer And Another Vs. Savitri Devi & Others 49.

RFA-6124-2015 Commanding Officer Vs. Varinder Kumar & Others 50.

RFA-6125-2015 Commanding Officer And Another Vs. Mann Singh & Another 51.

RFA-6126-2015 Commanding Officer And Another Vs. Manga Singh & Others 52.

RFA-6127-2015 Commanding Officer Vs. Ravinder Singh & Another 53.

RFA-6128-2015 Commanding Officer Vs. Malkiat Singh And Others 54.

RFA-6129-2015 Commanding Officer Vs. Santokh Singh & Others 55.

RFA-6130-2015 Commanding Officer Vs. Mahasho Ram & Others 56.

RFA-6131-2015 Commanding Officer Vs. Mehro & Others 57.

RFA-6132-2015 Commanding Officer Vs. Munshi Ram & Others 58.

RFA-6133-2015 Commanding Officer And Another Vs. Vidya Devi And Others 59.

RFA-6134-2015 Commanding Officer And Another Vs. Hans Raj And Another 60.

RFA-6135-2015 Commanding Officer Vs. Malkiat Singh & Others 61.

RFA-6136-2015 Commanding Officer Vs. Amar Nath & Others 62.

RFA-6137-2015 Commanding Officer Vs. Chandu & Others 63.

RFA-6138-2015 Commanding Officer Vs. Mulakh Raj And Others 64.

RFA-6139-2015 Commanding Officer Vs. Budhi Singh & Others 65.

RFA-6140-2015 Commanding Officer Vs. Malkiat Singh And Others 66.

RFA-373-2016 Chain Singh Vs. Union Of India & Others 67.

RFA-1442-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Mohinder Singh & Others 68.

RFA-1050-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Dev Raj & Others 69.

RFA-1051-2016 Commanding Officer Vs. Prithvi Pal Singh & Others

Sr. No.

Case No.

Party's Name 70.

RFA-3111-2017 Commanding Officer Vs. Dhian Singh And Others 71.

RFA-3112-2017 Commanding Officer Vs. Prem Chand And Others 72.

RFA-3113-2017 Commanding Officer Vs. Geeta Devi And Others 73.

RFA-3114-2017 Commanding Officer Vs. Churu And Others 74.

RFA-3115-2017 Commanding Officer Vs. Dumni And Others 75.

RFA-3116-2017 Commanding Officer Vs. Gian Chand And Others 76.

RFA-3117-2017 Commanding Officer Vs. Girdhari Lal And Others 77.

RFA-3118-2017 Commanding Officer Vs. Jobnu Devi And Others 78.

RFA-3119-2017 Commanding Officer Vs. Santa Ram And Others 79.

RFA-3120-2017 Commanding Officer Vs. Preeto Devi And Others 80.

RFA-3121-2017 Commanding Officer Vs. Anita Devi And Others (Anil Kshetarpal) Judge May 07, 2025 "DK"