Irshad Ahmed v. State Of Haryana And Others

CRM-M No. 43995 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No. 43995 of 2024 Date of Decision: 16.09.2024 Irshad Ahmed ...PeƟƟoner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Mohd. Arshad, Advocate for the peƟƟoner.

Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police StaƟon SecƟons 07.01.2021 Utawar, District Palwal 148, 149, 323, 341, 379-B, 506 IPC and 25 of Arms Act (SecƟon 307 IPC added later on) 1.

Seeking issuance of appropriate direcƟons to the official respondents No.2 to 4 to arrest the respondents No.5 to 7 in the FIR capƟoned above, the peƟƟoner has come up before this Court under SecƟon 528 BNSS. 2.

Counsel for the peƟƟoner confines his prayer to the extent of deciding the representaƟon of the peƟƟoner (Annexure P-3) in a Ɵme bound manner. 3.

NoƟce served upon the official respondent through State counsel. The nature of order which this Court proposes to pass, there is no necessity of calling any response from the State.

4.

State counsel submits that they would take a decision on the same within a period of three months.

5.

In view of prayer made by counsel for the peƟƟoner, respondent No.3 is directed to decide representaƟon dated 26.04.2024 (Annexure P-3) himself/herself or Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.17 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

CRM-M No. 43995 of 2024 by delegaƟng the same to any officer not below the rank of HPS, within a period of two months by passing a speaking and reasoned order and such order be also communicated to the peƟƟoner as well as his counsel on the e-mail ID provided to State counsel during the course of day.

6.

There would be no need for a cerƟfied copy of this order, and any Advocate for the PeƟƟoner and State can download this order and other relevant parƟculars from the official web page of this court and aƩest it to be a true copy. 7.

PeƟƟon is allowed with the observaƟons menƟoned above. All pending applicaƟons, if any, stand disposed.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 16.09.2024 JyoƟ Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.17 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh