Maden v. State Of Haryana Etc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RFA No.589 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.02.2015 Shrimati Maden ... Appellant Vs.

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL 1.

Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment?

2.

To be referred to reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present:- Mr. R.S.Hooda, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Abhinash Jain, AAG, Haryana.

AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) C.M. No.1125-CI-2014 For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, delay of 175 days in filing the appeal, is condoned.

C.M. stands disposed.

RFA No.589 of 2014 (O&M) For orders see, detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed today in RFA No.588 of 2014 titled as Mohammad Hanif and others vs. State of Haryana and others. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE February 13, 2015 savita SAVITA DEVI KADIAN 2015.02.19 14:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh