Om Parkash And Another v. Manjit Singh And Others
! "
#
$
!
" #
"
$"
% !
& '# ( !)$ #
$'
!#*)$+( '# ( !# ",-
"
$"%
$ #
'
/, / (
/, +0
,! "
#
$ * ( #
$1
2
/, (,
$
3- '
4(
$5 '( / /,/ / ( + ,# #
$ , 6
1
/ 20
' , /
/, +
'
/ '7 / 0
(
/
$
(
3! '4
'4''8% 3 ! '4', 5'5'8% ,0', 5''8% 3!,'4 ''8% 9- '
40
''8%(
$
'4''8%
$
' $/$
'"
/ ,
, '# #
$ (
.(
( /6 3 !,'3 06 $
,
/(
,' - '3'
,
"
$ $
$
$
$
"
$
$
,
,
, ,'
.
' (
(,
,
3!,'3 , # /%$
$( /
0,
$
, 6,' 9!,'3'
6 : 0 '(
$
'
($ 6
$ ' ,
'
# /%$
, $ !,'3 5
$ ,
'
.. &&
'9(
/, '( (
'(
/
$
,
'
(
/,
(
$
$
, '
/& '
'
4 ;
$
$ /
&
/ $( 7
'(
/
3 <
$
/
$
$
, $ 6 $
; /
5:< '4'
/$
3!,'3 (
4!,'=
(
,; / !,'
3 ,( '
(7
(
, !,'
3=
$ " $
'()*( +, (-.* +-/ +-0)*1'
23# 4'(5 (-.* +-/ 0)*1'3
6 7 #"#8//85'(3*+-+ 23# 4)# "+,()*+ +49*+-/'+ +0 667
77' /
(
/
$
; /
,
,
9 '
$
(
$
(
/ /
,
(
; /
/ '
/
'(
(
3!,'5'$; /
( (, ,
'
,
;
/
* ( #
$
0
$
* ( #
$
0
&
/
$
$
' /
$
/
/$
' (
,(
;('
4' / ( ( /6 3!,'
3.
(
"
,
,( % ( 8 %
9!,'3
$ $ 6 =
$' ,(,
$
( ,
$
'
,
,,
, # /%$
353 $( 7
, (
$ 7 $
.(
/,
$ , 0
/
$
/
/,.
"
, / .
$
0
&
," $
/, # &
'()*( +, (-.*:3 9+31
38;'+#
'
# &
" $
'( % >10. From the ratio of the aforesaid judgments, following points emerge:
(a) merits of the averments sought to be incorporated by way of amendment are not to be judged at the stage of allowing the prayer for amendment;
(b) the dominant purpose of the amendment is to minimise the litigation;
(c) the amendment once allowed and incorporated relates back to the date of the initial institution of the suit;
(d) the Court, however, in appropriate case may restrict the application of doctrine of relation back and permit the application of the amendment from the date the amendment is allowed.
'&
$/ ; ' " $
? " $
#"# 8//85'(3*+-+:3 9+31
38;'+
(
$
"
,.
'
,
$ ,
"
0 " $
#"#8//85'(3*+-+:3 9+31
38;'+ :
( /
$
'
/,
(
; '
/
$
5 0 6$
/
'(
$
'
$,,
.
, 6
,* ( #
$
0,
, ?6%4% 9 !' " $
/, @
& '
$ " $ $
4 *
$
(
$
3 ; '
9
$
,'
"
$"
=
$8 A 8+ = / A 8+