← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/48898/2022dismissed

Satnarayan @ Nainu v. State Of Haryana

2024-03-04Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari1 pages

2024:PHHC:030611

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (207) CRM-M-48898-2022 Date of Decision:- 04.03.2024 Satnarayan @ Nainu ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ......Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

Present:

Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana.

**** KULDEEP TIWARI , J. (Oral) In pursuance of the directions issued by this Court vide order dated 15.01.2024, the learned State counsel has informed this Court that all the prosecution witnesses have been examined. Now, it is fixed for recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C.of all the accused including the present petitioner.

In view of the specific statement suffered by learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition at this stage with liberty to reaccess this Court, in case there is an inordinate delay in conclusion of the trial.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (KULDEEP TIWARI) March 04, 2024 JUDGE geeta Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No GEETA RANI 2024.03.06 12:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment