Vikrant Sharma v. Union Of India And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 20555 of 2023 Date of Decision:06.10.2023 Vikrant Sharma ....Petitioner vs.
Union of India and others ....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:
Mr. Gurmej S.Bhinder, Advocate for Mr. S.K.Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Monica Chawla, Central Govt. Counsel for the Union of India *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.
The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to re-issue his passport.
2.
Learned counsel for Union of India, at the outset, submits that passport authority would issue passport to the petitioner shortly as matter has already been processed.
3.
Learned counsel for Union of India, on being asked, states that passport would be issued within three weeks from today. 4.
In the wake of statement of learned counsel for Union of India, the petition stands disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 06.10.2023 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2023.10.06 14:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment