Raghbir Singh @ Sukhbir And ORS v. Tarawati And ORS

RSA No.1352 of 2016 (O&M) {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.1352 of 2016 (O&M) Date of decision:08.12.2016 Raghbir Singh @ Sukhbir and others ... Appellants Vs.

Tarawati and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. S.P.Chahar, Advocate for the appellants.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) C.M.No.3779-C of 2016 For the reasons stated in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, delay of 79 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of.

RSA No.1352 of 2016 (O&M) The suit has been filed by the plaintiffs challenging the mutations mentioned therein regarding exchange of land measuring about one acre with the constructed house on the premise that they were minors at that time. The suit had been instituted in the year 2008, whereas, as per the record brought on record, they attained the majority way back in the year 1988, thus, the suit was ex facie barred by law of limitation in view of the provisions of Article 60(a) of the Limitation Act. Savita 2016.12.13 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

RSA No.1352 of 2016 (O&M) {2} In view of the aforementioned observation, I do not intend to differ with the findings rendered by both the Courts below which are based upon the appreciation of oral and documentary evidence, much less no substantial question of law arises for adjudication of the present appeal. Accordingly, the Regular Second Appeal stands dismissed. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE December 08, 2016 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2016.12.13 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh