Karandeep Singh And Others v. State Of Haryana And Another
CRM-M-40796-2025 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-40796-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 25.09.2025 Karandeep Singh and others ... Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and another ... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present:- Mr. S.S.Sahu, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. R.K. Ambavta, DAG, Haryana.
Ms. Sunita Devi, Advocate for respondent No.2.
YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR , J.
(Oral) 1.
Prayer in this petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for quashing of FIR No.302 dated 05.11.2024 registered at Police Station City Ratia Tehsil Ratia, District Fatehabad (Annexure P-1) under Sections 238(A), 305 and 331(4) of BNS, 2023. and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise.
2.
This Court vide order dated27.08.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send his/her report qua the genuineness of the compromise.
SATYAWAN 2025.09.25 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-40796-2025 (O&M) -23.
Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ratia (Fatehabad) and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 16.09.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence.
4.
Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 6.
In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant F.I.R. following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 titled as 'Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another' and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in (2012) 10 SCC 303 titled as 'Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others', this petition is allowed and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise qua petitioner(s), are hereby quashed. 7.
Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. 25.09.2025 (YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SATYAWAN 2025.09.25 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document