Harpreet Kaur And Another v. State Of Punjab And Another

CRM-M-40817-2025 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-40817-2025 Date of decision: 11.12.2025 HARPREET KAUR AND ANR.

...PETITIONERS

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

Present:

Mr. S.S.Rangi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Didar Singh, Advocate and Mr. Fateh Sahota, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Simran Goria, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. P.S. Saini, Advocate for Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate for the complainant/respondent No.2. **** RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) 1.

Prayer in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in a case FIR No.86 dated 05.07.2025, under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 61(2) of BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Dehlon, District Police Commissionerate, Ludhiana.

2.

Vide order dated 10.09.2025, while granting interim protection, the petitioners were directed to join investigation. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that pursuant to order dated 10.09.2025, petitioners have joined the investigation and as such their interim bail may be made absolute.

4.

Learned State counsel, on instructions, affirmed the fact that the petitioners have joined the investigation and they are no more required for further investigation.

RENU BALA 2025.12.13 12:20 I agree to specified portions of this document

CRM-M-40817-2025 -25.

Learned counsel for the complainant has opposed the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 6.

In view of the above, interim order dated 10.09.2025 is made absolute subject to compliance of conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS.

7.

Petition stands allowed.

11.12.2025 (RAJESH BHARDWAJ) renubala JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No RENU BALA 2025.12.13 12:20 I agree to specified portions of this document