Biru @ Kancha v. The State Of U.T. Chandigarh

CRM-M-53318 of 2021 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-53318 of 2021 Date of Decision:07.01.2022 Biru @ Kancha ...... Petitioner

Versus

The State of U.T. Chandigarh ......... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH

Present:

Mr. Mandeep Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajiv Anand, APP, U.T. Chandigarh ***** AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J. (ORAL)
ase heard via    

 After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition at this stage.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

[It is to be noticed that though the petition has been described to be the 2nd such petition in the head-note, the Registry has pointed out that he had also filed two petitions earlier, but with learned counsel submitting that the description in the head-note is an inadvertent error because he has annexed the orders passed in both the petitions alongwith the petition itself, which is seen to be so.] January 07, 2022 (AMOL RATTAN SINGH) dinesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No DINESH 2022.01.09 19:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document