← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/41096/2025allowed

Ajeet Alias Jagbir And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

2026-03-19Ms. Justice Aaradhna Sawhney2 pages

CRM-M-41096-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-41096-2025 Date of decision: 19.03.2026 Ajeet @ Jagbir and others

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY Present :

Mr. Kartar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vishal Singh, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Davinder Kaliraman, Advocate for Mr. S.K. Bishnoi, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. ***** AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J.(ORAL) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS, seeking quashing of FIR No.281 dated 24.04.2025 registered under Sections 115, 126, 3(5), 351(3) BNS (challan filed u/s 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 351(3), 3(5), 238 BNS) at Police Station Palla, District Faridabad along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 16.07.2025 (Annexure P-2).

2.

With the intervention of respectables and elderly persons of the society, the parties have arrived at a settlement vide compromise deed dated 16.07.2025 (Annexure P-2), which is duly signed by them. The matter was referred to the Court below for recording of statements of the parties and to report with respect to genuineness of the compromise arrived at between the parties. The learned trial Court vide report dated 02.12.2025 has apprised this Court that the compromise arrived at between the parties is genuine and without any pressure.

HAMANT 2026.03.20 19:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-41096-2025 3.

Respondents No.2 to 4 is represented by his counsel, who admits the factum of compromise.

4.

In view of the aforesaid report of the trial Court and in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another", 2012(4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and "Narinder Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another", (2014) 6 SCC 466, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose can be served by keeping the criminal proceedings pending, since the complainant has himself compromised the dispute with the petitioners/ accused persons. 5.

In view of the facts and circumstances mentioned hereinabove, the present petition is allowed. FIR No. 281 dated 24.04.2025 registered under Sections 115, 126, 3(5), 351(3) BNS (challan filed u/s 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 351(3), 3(5), 238 BNS) at Police Station Palla, District Faridabad and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed on the basis of compromise qua the present petitioners. (AARADHNA SAWHNEY) JUDGE 19.03.2026 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes / No Whether reportable :

Yes / No HAMANT 2026.03.20 19:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document