Madan Lal v. Kurukshetra University Kurukshetra And ORS

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Letters Patent Appeal No. 2139 of 2017 Date of Decision: 16.09.2024 Madan Lal ... Appellant(s)

Versus

Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sheel Nagu, Chief Justice. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. Sandeep Panwar, Advocate for the appellant(s).

Mr. Amarjit Singh Virk, Advocate for respondent No.1 and 2.

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

1.

The appellant's counsel, at the outset, prays for permission to withdraw the appeal in order to avail remedy under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1947 Act") which is not opposed by the learned counsel representing the respondents. 2.

In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek reference under Section 10 of the 1947 Act. If the workman applies for reference, the appropriate authority will expedite its disposal. If the matter is referred to the Court, then efforts should be made to expedite its disposal.

(Anil Kshetarpal) (Sheel Nagu) Judge Chief Justice September 16, 2024 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2024.09.20 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document