← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaLPA/2221/2017disposed of

Nachhatter Singh v. Punjab Mandi Baord And ORS.

2018-12-06Mr. Justice Krishna Murari,Mr. Justice Arun Palli2 pages

LPA-2221-2017 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH LPA-2221-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 06, 2018 Nachhatter Singh ...Appellant

Versus

Punjab Mandi Board and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI, CHIEF JUSTICE.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI, JUDGE.

Present:

Mr. G.S. Bal, Senior Advocate with Mr. A.D.S. Bal, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

KRISHNA MURARI, C.J. (ORAL) CM-4884-LPA-2017:

For the reasons set out in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed. Consequently, the delay of 21 days in filing the accompanying appeal is condoned. CM-1660-LPA-2018:

This is an application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC seeking correction of the date of arbitral award, in the grounds of appeal, which has PRASHANT KAPOOR 2018.12.14 09:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

LPA-2221-2017 (O&M) been wrongly typed as 02.7.2014-Annexure P-8, instead of 12.01.2016Annexure P-4. For the reason set out in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed in terms of the prayer made. The amended Grounds of Appeal is taken on record. LPA-2221-2017:

For orders, see detailed order of even date passed in LPA No. 130 of 2018 (Gurmeet Singh v. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Bathinda and others).

(KRISHNA MURARI) CHIEF JUSTICE (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE December 06, 2018 Pkapoor Whether Speaking/Reasoned:

YES / NO Whether Reportable:

YES / NO PRASHANT KAPOOR 2018.12.14 09:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document