Kuldeep @Bablu v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-42162 of 2019 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-42162 of 2019 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.2.2020 ...

Kuldeep @ Bablu ................Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr. Vipin Pal Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Dimple Jain, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.

...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has since joined the investigation.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Vijay Singh, concedes this fact, further contending that the petitioner is not required for custodial interrogation by the local police. In these circumstances, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 1.10.2019 is made absolute, subject to fulfillment of following conditions:- i) that the petitioner shall appear in the Court on each and BANITA CHUGH 2020.02.19 14:09 I am the author of this document

CRM-M-42162 of 2019 -2every date of hearing. ii)that the petitioner shall not give any threat or intimidation to the prosecution witnesses.

iii)that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

iv)that the petitioner shall surrender his passport before the Investigating Officer and if he is not having passport then he shall file an affidavit in that regard.

In case the petitioner violates any term and condition on which the bail has been granted to him, the prosecution would be entitled to apply for cancellation of bail.

The petition in that way is allowed.

( H.S. Madaan ) 18.2.2020 Judge chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No BANITA CHUGH 2020.02.19 14:09 I am the author of this document