Sachin @ Bhatti v. State Of Punjab

1-



   
   



 !"#$%$ &' ()* +,-.

 



 

 

  

 '  /0 )1 )

)

     



 


    

 



!!!


) .2 03' "    



 
#$%   &  ' ( 
( 
  )*)%  +    , '

-. &   

(         /0' 1%

*$ )*)# 

 
222 222+).

222+%.222+#.  &'&&
 )*)%+ , '
-.
)34  5

2636   

  7   

)

"   /08 

 

 

22 *$ )*)#     5        8  4 5   8

 55

    8   9 &

 8 55      5(

:(  55 

& 85(   55

5  

  &85   &
0 
 

2-    5       8



4 ;      &  &5    %)   8 <     &5    %23   8    8 

55   &8 55 8  

5 4 0    8 5

 

 55      %

  &

 

     

 

&5 

 

    &

 

 5 = 

 & 22 *$ )*)# " 8  (  

5  

=  8   & 



=

           &     5 >4 

 <

     

; &      

 

0  

         <

   

#

  8

 & 





0    &

    

 

      

  85 5   5          55

   ?

  5

 =    

 

 

  8   

"      5   8     <

   

0

 

          

 

"  >      

   

       

 

       

&

@

The petitioner is in custody since 11.08.2024. It is a debatable

3question as to whether, the ingredients for commission of offences punishable under Section 111 of BNS are attracted against the petitioner or not. Trial will take considerable time to conclude. In the considered opinion of this Court, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody anymore. It is a well settled proposition of law that bail is the rule and jail is an exception. Keeping in view the above discussed facts, but without meaning to make any comment on the merits of the case, lest the same prejudice the trial, this court is of the considered opinion that the petition deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, the same is allowed              

               A &     > B  

7 & 

 

 5 



8   

&    4
) 5    ()* +,-.