Raj Kumar And ORS v. Pankaj Goyal

E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB IN TH B AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3200-2024 e of Decision: July 16, 2025 Date ........Petitioners RAJ KUMAR PANKAJ GOY CORAM: HO

Present:

M M AND ORS

Versus

YAL ........Respondent ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARK KESH MANUJA Mr. Shalender Mohan, Advocat te and the petitioners.

r. Purushotam, Advocate for t Mr. Manish Dadwal, AAG, Hary yana.

**** ANUJA, J. (ORAL) HARKESH MA Le earned State counsel represe enting the respondent informs s that the order passed by the Writ Court has s been stayed by the Hon'ble e Apex Court in SLP No.112/2025.

In view of the above, learned d counsel for the petitioners s does not press s the present petition at this s stage, however, with liberty to o seek revival of f the present petition, subject to final outcome of the SLP.

Dis smissed as not pressed with t the aforesaid liberty.

ule stands discharged.

Ru 16.07.2025 Tejwinder (H Whether speaking/reasone HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE ed Yes/No Yes/No Whether Reportable TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.07.17 23:43 I agree to specified portions of this document