Sweety v. Raj Kumar
!
"#
!$%&%"'(
)*!! + ,,,,,,! % %"'!- .&, / 012 - ,,,,,,!&3"'4!'
( 56 ), ) )
! """"
) ,
6
!
# $ %
&
'
% ( ! %%
&
! ) * + %, ! *" "
-. ) ) ) )) .
+ "!! ! ")) .
.
)% - ' %)
! !
!! )
!! * &
!!* ) !
/ $0
% 0 ' )0 ) . + 1 !
%)
* )) 0
)0!
!
% ! ) .
&
)
2
! !
!
& 3
!) !!* ! .
")) .
) % !
4
& Though, this Court is of the considered opinion that there is no illegality or infirmity in the order dated 02.06.2025 as it was on account of nonappearance of the petitioner that her bail was cancelled and ")) .
.
)% , . in view of the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage to grant the petitioner one more opportunity to surrender before the trial Court and further keeping in view the fact that the absence of the petitioner does not attract the consequences of detaining her into custody as she is willing to join the trial and the ultimate aim is to ensure timely disposal of the cases before the learned trial Court, the present petition is disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to surrender before the learned trial Court on or before 12.08.2025 and it is further ordered that on her surrender and on moving appropriate application, the learned trial Court admit her to bail subject to her furnishing personal as well as surety bonds to its satisfaction. However, this petition shall be deemed to be dismissed if the petitioner does not abide by this order.
7.
The arrest of the petitioner is stayed till the next date of hearing before the appellate Court.
4
!
5
!
) !!*
)
6 !%7 879
6 !
) 879