Jaspal Singh And Others v. State Of Punjab And Others

CRM-M-41372-2025(O&M) - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-41372-2025(O&M) Decided on : 17.11.2025 JASPAL SINGH AND OTHERS . . . Petitioners

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR PRESENT: Mr. Charnjit Singh, Advocate for the applicants/petitioners.

Mr. Rohit Hans, DAG Punjab.

Mr. S.S. Brar, Advocate for respondent No.2.

**** YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR , J. (Oral) 1.

Prayer in this petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for quashing of F.I.R. No.110 dated 24.05.2025, registered under Sections 333, 115(2), 3(5), of BNS, 2023, at Police Station Sadar Bathinda, (Annexure P-1) and (61(2), 191(3), 190 of BNS added later on through DDR No.26 dated 28/05/2025) (Annexure P1A) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 06.06.2025 (Annexure P-2).

2.

This Court vide order dated 17.09.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send his/her report qua the genuineness of the compromise.

3.

Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties had appeared before VISHAL VARDHAN 2025.11.18 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-41372-2025(O&M) - 2 - learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bathinda and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 06.11.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence.

4.

Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5.

In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served by continuing with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant F.I.R. following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 titled as 'Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another' and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in (2012) 10 SCC 303 titled as 'Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others'. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the F.I.R. No.110 dated 24.05.2025, registered under Sections 333, 115(2) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023, at Police Station Sadar Bathinda, (Annexure P-1) and (61(2), 191(3), 190 of BNS added later on through DDR No.26 dated 28/05/2025) (Annexure P-1A), and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed on the basis of compromise dated 06.06.2025, arrived at between the parties. (YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR) JUDGE November 17, 2025 Vishal Vardhan Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No VISHAL VARDHAN 2025.11.18 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document