Kamal Mehto v. State Of Punjab
/ IN TH HE HIGH COURT FOR THE E STATES OF PUNJAB AND HANDIGARH HARYANA AT CH ( )* 123.3 /"/" *+ (
"""33 - ,-..
.
""".41 &
! " #$%&! & % Mr. -./0& 1 & .
/2)( '
'13 0) %' #"
4&) )*&
&)*
5/ 6 , "
"
!"#
$ " 75 % & ' ( )*)&) )
()* & )&+ & 4 & & ) )* & ) )* & ) ) *+& & -( ) &* -(. & && ) ",
"
$ ( ) ) ( +
& && &
) .
) ) & ) + ( + * + & +& .+&
5 ) & ) ( ) . ) + 5 4 & ( . ( * 8++8( )* * *& ) &+ &(( &&&&) - +&) )
9 &(.
. 2( ( ) ) &+ + +*. &&) 4 ) * &+ & - &) )+
5. &) . +& : . ) )* & .&& )* + &
& +&+ + & 5 + & +&
++ ))( ( & +
5 # 4 0 + - + * &) ) +& +&8 4 +.) ++ +! 9 ( 5662+ - 57 7&"'
! "#$% % %&&' ( ) * "##$+,-./+0"
12%' 3
3 3 "#&#+ ,-25&' / 5656.50 !+! .
.+ 0 %%#' ( .4/056"7.20!
+
.8 0"&&' 9 / / 56"% .$0 !+! .+ 0 776' :
: 93 ;<
"#1 1%+ ,-"%&2'
(
"#72+
,-#&7') ( * '"##$ $+ ,-"12% ; "#7 77+ ,-%"2 1+ &( &;
;+&)* .
))( &( ( .) )2.(& ) &+ + "$ =(2& "$ &+ ( . <)* & "*& & ( 0 "
" ( && & However, while adjourning the case to 03.04.2020, the learned trial Court faile ed to consider the fact that .<+ )* +&* 0 &+ ( )
( &) & )( &) &+ & &&( "* / < )+(
.4/0 56"7 7.20 + .8 0"&&
4 + & )2 2 :>5'
$ $&+(( 2&
&+& && + &)* ).))2 :>5'
$ &+ ( .) 2<( <&&& ) 4& &)* ) )( ((+ ) 2& +( +&2( * "":>5'
$ ( (+)& & ) +&+& & &+(*) )2
$
&
""( ( 2( & ) -(. ( * 8++ + ( (8+ * ?< 1 . 8(8&+ & 1 )*)&+& .& + + 1 )* ( &+ & ) ) ) * ( /
6 < ) & & 9 56"% ++ = .4 4/02&&%
1* .( +). .( (( ). & & (+&
&)* *
5/ 6 , "
"
!"#
$ " 7 7 5 %& ' ()*& ) &+ & ( & +
-(. & ) ( & ( 2 )0 & *) *&& )
7* 62 2 " 5 ) * &*) &) ) )+ 0*)0 * ))& &)* ((
6). *&&) ) ) )) &+<& * ) <& * & & + ) & +
4 && & )
+*
5+ &&&) (&( 2+* & ) + )+ ( (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE /"/"(
Whet ther speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whet ther reportable Yes/No