Mukesh v. State Of Haryana And Others

CRM-M-42610-2019 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-42610-2019 Date of Decision: November 15, 2022 Mukesh ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr.B.S.Virk, DAG, Haryana.

........

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL) Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. impugning the order dated 02.09.2019 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat, whereby the revision filed against the order dated 27.07.2018 passed by learned JMIC, Panipat, was accepted for summoning the proposed accused under Section 190 1(b) Cr.P.C. The case is pending consideration since the year 2019. A perusal of the record would show that on 04.11.2019, no one was present on behalf of the petitioner. Thereafter the case came up for hearing on 12.12.2019 on which date again no-one was present. Then, the case came up for hearing on 28.09.2022 but again the petitioner was not represented by any one and hence the case was adjourned for today. Position is not different today. It has been brought to the notice of this Court by the learned State counsel that main accused in this case has already been acquitted by the trial Court on 11.04.2019.

MEENU 2022.11.16 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-42610-2019 -2After hearing the submissions made by learned State counsel, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this case. Dismissed for non-prosecution.

November 15, 2022 ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2022.11.16 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment