Sunny Kumar Alias Sandy v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-48915-2022 Date of Decision: 12.01.2023 Sunny Kumar @ Sandy ......... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ........ Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Saurav Kanojia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Virat Rana, AAG, Punjab.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) Status report dated 12.01.2023 filed by State counsel today in the Court is taken on record.

Vide order dated 04.11.2022, this Court had granted interim bail to the petitioner.

Counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits that all the conditions of interim order dated 04.11.2022 have been complied with and the petitioner accepts all the conditions.

State counsel does not dispute the statement made by counsel for the petitioner.

Furthermore, the petitioner was granted interim protection, and during the interregnum, there is no allegation that he had intimidated the witnesses. Given above, there would be no justification to discontinue the interim bail dated 04.11.2022 and the same is made absolute subject to the petitioner complying with the terms of the bail order.

The present petition is allowed. All pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 12.01.2023 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2023.01.13 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.