Anil Kumar And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.15 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-28734-2019 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-28734-2019 (O&M) Date of decision : 03.10.2019 Anil Kumar and others ... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Jasbir Mor, Advocate for the petitioners.

**** AMIT RAWAL , J. (ORAL) Petitioners are seeking indulgence of this Court for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to allow the petitioners to join the duties on the post of Block Project Assistant, Block Coordinate and District Coordinate in the Women and Child Development Department, Haryana, on their selection and recommendation of their names by the Service Provider/respondent No.3, after short-listing them for their appointments on the basis of their qualification, eligibility and on their merit basis on the above said post and allow them to continue in service, after allowing them to join the duties on their respective posts on contract basis under Outsourcing Policy Part II till regular appointments are made. In this regard, few of petitioners had submitted representations dated 26.08.2019 (Annexure P-10), but there is no adherence thereto. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners will

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.15 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-28734-2019 (O&M) be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.2-Director, Women and Child Development Department, Haryana, to consider the representations dated 26.08.2019 (Annexure P-10) and the representation which few of petitioners intend to submit, within a stipulated period. Without going into the merits and demerits of the claim of the petitioners, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2, to consider the representations dated 26.08.2019 (Annexure P-10) and the representation which few of petitioners intend to submit and decide the same within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, by passing a speaking order after affording opportunity of hearing to petitioners, failing which, respondent No.2, shall be liable to pay costs of `25,000/- to petitioners.

This condition of imposing costs is only to prevent petitioners to run from pillar to post and avail remedy of contempt in case of noncompliance of directions issued by this Court. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE 03.10.2019 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No