High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/28442/2019disposed of

Balkaran Singh And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

2019-10-01Mr. Justice Amit Rawal2 pages

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.14 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-28442-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-28442-2019 Date of decision : 01.10.2019 Balkaran Singh and others ... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. S.K. Malik, Advocate for the petitioners.

**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) Petitioners are seeking indulgence of this Court for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 24.05.2018 (Annexure P-5), whereby case of petitioners for promotion to the post of TGT Punjabi has been rejected and further writ of mandamus directing respondent No.2 to consider and promote the petitioners to the post of TGT Punjabi with all consequential benefits. In this regard, had submitted legal notice dated 16.07.2019 (Annexure P-7), but there is no adherence thereto. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners will be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.2-Director Elementary Education, Haryana, to consider the legal notice dated 16.07.2019 (Annexure P-7) keeping in view orders dated 12.09.2018 and 30.08.2019 (Annexures P-8 and P-9), within a stipulated period. Without going into the merits and demerits of the claim of the petitioners, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2, to consider the

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.14 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-28442-2019 legal notice dated 16.07.2019 (Annexure P-7) keeping in view orders dated 12.09.2018 and 30.08.2019 (Annexures P-8 and P-9), within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and shall pass a speaking order thereon after affording opportunity of hearing to petitioners, failing which, respondent No.2, shall be liable to pay costs of `25,000/- to petitioners.

This condition of imposing costs is only to prevent petitioners to run from pillar to post and avail remedy of contempt in case of noncompliance of directions issued by this Court. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE 01.10.2019 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No