← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaLPA/1420/2018dismissed

Priyanka Singh v. Guru Jambheshwar University Of Science & Technology Hisar And Others

2018-11-30Mr Justice Jaswant Singh,Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh2 pages



           Date of Decision: 30.11.2018 Dr. Priyanka Singh .....Appellant versus Guru Jambheshwar University of Science & Technology, Hisar through its Registrar and others .....Respondents      !

 "# "

 $  "    !

 "

 $   Present :

Mr. R.K.Malik, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Kanu, Advocate, for the appellant.

**** # "

 $  " %&' The appellant/petitioner admittedly was appointed as Assistant Professor on contract basis on 16.08.2012 and she continued till 31.05.2013. Again she worked on contract basis from 09.08.2013 to 30.05.2014 and then from 13.08.2014 to 23.05.2015. Lastly she was appointed on contract basis on 11.08.2015. Her services were dispensed with on 06.02.2018 which was subject matter of challenge in the writ petition. During pendency of the writ petition, the appellant/petitioner was given a fresh appointment on contract basis on 03.07.2018 and thus the learned Single Judge was of the opinion that the cause of action does not survive and accordingly the petition was disposed of.

RAVINDER SHARMA 2018.12.20 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

        () 2.

A review application was also filed by the appellant/petitioner which came to be dismissed vide order dated 13.08.2018 by the learned Single Judge on the ground that there was no error apparent on the face of record.

3.

In view of the fact that the main relief claimed in the writ petition was that of a certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 21.03.2018 and to reinstate the appellant/petitioner, once a fresh contractual appointment was offered which was duly accepted by the appellant/ petitioner, we also see no reason as to how any cause of action in the writ petition survive. In our considered opinion as well there was no cause of action left to the appellant/petitioner in the writ petition and the learned Single Judge rightly held so.

4.

In view of the above facts and discussion, the impugned order does not call for any interference by us. The appeal is devoid of merits and accordingly stands dismissed.

    

                  

 !"

  Whether speaking/reasoned √Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No√ RAVINDER SHARMA 2018.12.20 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document